Search results

WHere is the evidence that he's an asylum seeker that arrived in a lorry? I haven't seen it. I've only seen your unsupported claim. But it makes no difference. The thread is about small boat arrivals. The attacker arrived 5 years ago, and was an asylum seeker. He had been granted asylum.

If you posted it once, post it again. it would be so easy. or you could copy and paste your supposed proof. Or you could add it as an additional quote. :rolleyes: But no you're going to swerve and backtrack now for the rest of the evening. :rolleyes:

I know what happened and I've corrected it. Aveatry posted a news item about a 22 year old attacker, who is not an asylum seeker, nor arrived in a boat. At the same time yorksbuilder posted a news item about a 29 year old rapist in Scotland, and I posted yoursbuilders article rather than the...

Its a partnership with plod, and fillystine impersonating CST will a) reduce the credibility of CST, and b) make any police action more difficult to enforce.

Sorry to spoil your fun, but I'm not wasting several hours swatting away your batty false accusations. I'll leave you to your fetid imaginations. bonne soirée, Buonasera, buenas noches, Guten Abend.

:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO: The other more obvious explanation is that you presented a supposed reply from CST. Perhaps I should repot it that you are now impersonating a CST officer. I suspect that's a criminal offence. :rolleyes:

You posted an unrelated news item in a thread about asylum seekers arriving by boat, purely due to your opportunism and bigotry. And you call me disingenuous. :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO: And based on your bigoted mistake you form an opinion that I am someone else. :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

My mistake. The two people are not connected and are different. Yorksbuilder conflated the two for his own peculiar reasons. The attacker originally referred to is 22 years old. The one referred to by yorksbuilder is 29 years old.:rolleyes: I've corrected my post. Yorksbuilder obvious;y had...

Err, i wasn't talking to you. So why did you butt in? :giggle:

https://www.lbc.co.uk/article/uxbridge-stabbing-london-afghan-attack-5HjdFz9_2/ Not an asylum seeker, not a small boat arrival. much to aveatry's disappointment. :rolleyes: it really spoiled his opportunism. :ROFLMAO:

:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO: Here we go again, 4 hours of repetitive false accusations based on idiotic assumptions. One idiot who repetitively reported anti Semitism incorrectly, and incorrectly reported a supposed quote alteration.

So you posted it in the small boat arrivals to foment hatred and discrimination against foreigners? :rolleyes: My guess is that you assumed he was an asylum seeker, so you eagerly grasped the opportunity as fast as you possibly could.

:rolleyes::rolleyes:"Dothing"? Is that what illustrating your bigotry is? :rolleyes::rolleyes:

I find your typical resort to accusing someone of a mental imbalance illustrates your inability to participate in sensible debate.

There's no suggestion that the attacker was an asylum seeker, nor that he arrived by boat. So why post that news item in the thread discussing boat asylum seeker arrivals? In fact why post it at all? Your intention was obvious, to foment hatred and discrimination against foreigners.

I've never watched or seen LBC. If I call it a newspaper instead of a news media site, it doesn't suggest I live anywhere else but UK. :rolleyes: You've just demonstrated how you jump to conclusions based on what you want to believe. :rolleyes:

I'm sure the police will have a word with the newspaper if they feel it warrants it. But the comment from the police was very clear: You chose to ignore the request from the police. :rolleyes: And your choice of posting it on here is obvious given your previous comments.

I very much doubt that because you were nowhere as bad as the others. You just kept repeating a non word 'dothing'. :rolleyes: