Search results

Interestingly, the British were well aware of the opposition of the Palestinians to the Partition of Palestine. Maybe that was why they abstained from the resolution 181 vote. In a written submission to the UN, by the British: https://www.un.org/unispal/document/auto-insert-202927/

Are they?

It was in jest.

The civil war started when the Resolution was passed in November 1947, against the objections of the Arab League, Palestine/ Transjordan was not represented. The civil war continued until the British left and the Arab League became involved (May 1948) Both the Arab League, and the Jews had...

We're I'm not argumentative, and it was just under twenty years ago that you joined. So get your facts right. ;)

Might is right, I fear. If you go back to the UN General Assembly Resolution 181. The UN is only a collection of member nations. Its primary role is in peace keeping, and resolutions to end conflicts. Only the security Council Resolutions are enforceable. The resolutions of the General Assembly...

That's for the best when your claims have been disproved. :rolleyes:

Guido Fawkes again. :rolleyes: If there was any truth in the article, which I doubt, it proves that Lord Ali had enormous influence in UK's foreign policy during the Tories debacle, so why would he bother about a few thousand pounds of gifts to Keir Starmer. Maybe he donated thousands of pounds...

It's more about the the withdrawal of the WFA and keeping the two child allowance limit

Yes, to avoid his son being disturbed by the press.

Do you bother to read any posts, other than your own!!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racism_by_country Which links to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racism_in_the_United_Kingdom https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racism_in_the_United_Kingdom The Wikipedia report that you relied on takes its findings from the survey of racism towards black people. Note...

Your claims are based on racism towards black people only. Racism and race hatred in general is not only directed at black people. Indeed, I would argue that racism towards brown skin people has rocketed recently, mostly motivated by the disgusting blame game played by the right-wing politicians.

It was your claim, it's down to you to provide evidence to support your claim. It's not responsibility to disprove something which you have failed to demonstrate. :rolleyes:

The Arab League had objected to the plan all along, and vowed to resist the implementation of the Resolution, which was not enforceable. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli%E2%80%93Palestinian_conflict#:~:text=Following%20the%20Declaration%20of%20the,the%201948%20Arab%E2%80%93Israeli%20War...

They should have cosied up to USA. :rolleyes:

You have personal experience of racism in those countries, to compare with your personal experience of racism in UK? :rolleyes: Racism isn't some kind of an issue on an Objective List, where 1st place is something to be smug about. Racism is a cancer in society, it divides it, it decimates...

:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO: Based on your personal experiences? :rolleyes: https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2024/08/uk-government-must-address-root-cause-of-racism-that-plagues-our-society/...

The original conflict occurred in 1948, when Israelis moved into Palestine and drove out the Palestinians. It's been disproportionate tit for tat ever since, with a consistent and continuous attack against civilians in the West Bank.

And you've made one that meets the definition of racist: You always exploit every opportunity to promote your disgusting racism, even exploiting the murder of little girls, using disinformation to incite violence: