Search results for query: ignore

...local economies yes Wealth creation encouraged yes Waste opposed yes The rest of you throbbers on this thread replying to me, i have you on ignore for good reason, so if you don't get a reply you know why, you're mostly trolls or worse, but for some reason i like Ellal, they is not a bad...

Your argument just became so circular it vanished up its own back end. Perhaps it made sense to you?

That's a post from an ignorant person who doesn't understand the concept of innocent until proven guilty... Of course if it had been an anti Palestinian mob who had been acquitted you'd be popping the champagne corks! But then supporters of genocide do tend to have a very one sided view of the...

...take place with or without Sharia courts. These so called unelected leaders would just carry on as usual. Coercion happens in sorts of communities. Golf clubs for example, you fallout with the committee and you get blackballed and the members ignore you, eventually your membership gets...

Yawn... Do what you like, I care not if you cling to racist lies... But think about this... Why do so many migrants want to make their way to the UK? It's because most of them already speak English! That's the way of the world!

Before i finally put you and your minny hissy outrages on Ignore, can i just add you are way too easily triggered for a lefty.. no actually this is normal behaviour, id love to measure your BP with you sat there just watching a vid of Far-rage smiling bless you x Anyway.. lets not be like...

Carry on believing whatever guff you believe in... And live in ignorance! Hint: There is a difference between upholding the law and having an opinion that the law is wrong ;)

You think the court gave them an exemption from being prosecuted for criminal acts in the name of the cause? don't be daft

Err... The court said they aren't criminals... Would you prefer to live in a country where the court ignores the law when it suits you?

...One thing they have in common with Sharia and Beth Din courts is that they have no impact on Civil law , so any judgements they make can be ignored. Participation in these courts is voluntary. A.I Catholic courts in the UK, known as Diocesan Tribunals, handle canon law matters, primarily...

"If you look at the data - thats obviously nonsense" Really? You ignore the negative impact of brexit in your figures... And care to tell us where the pound was in comparison to the Euro prior to June 2016 and where it has consistently been since then? A simple question for you... Is it...

If you look at the data - thats obviously nonsense 2025 (latest)5.1% Labour 20244.1% 20234.0% 20223.7% 20214.8% covid 20204.5% covid 20193.6% 20184.1% 20174.4% 20164.9% brexit vote 20155.5%

You can blame brexit for a lot of that... Oh but that's right, we should apparently just 'move on'... And ignore the £90bn lost each year because of that vote! And of course ignore the effects of a devalued currency and it's inflationary impact year on year :rolleyes:

I agree with you. Multiculturism isn't working today. When there were fewer it was acceptable, but now that some places: Birmingham, Bradford, London, etc, are becoming majority muslim it is becoming conceivable that the country as a whole could become the same. They do, after all, breed like...

Multiculturalism obviously. It hasn't succeeded anywhere. If differing cultures are going to co-exist then they need to move some distance away from where they started from. We've moved away from Alf Garnett and the Black and White Minstrels. But it seems we're the ones doing all the...

You fail to analyse the %ile they occupy as tax payers. Most of the taxes are paid by high earners.

...deficit by 2040 would force government to increase taxes, NIESR predicts" Link Unsurprisingly those that moan the loudest at tax rises also ignore the £90bn a year we are losing because of brexit... They of course tend to be supporters of the biggest economic/social suicide note in history!

Starmer, or anyone else, would need the support of Parliament for an early GE. Starmer can assume he has the support of his party until such times as anyone challenges his leadership. A challenger would need the support of about 81 MPs, and 5% of the grassroots of the party, or some strong...

I understand what you are saying, but the trolls aside the rest of us like to hear what you say. You do learn to ignore the trolls after a while and just take them for what they are. They like arguing because they have very few social skills and you have to take what they say with a pinch of salt.

Reform types, ignoramuses who ignore facts, deny reality and are easily conned.