Search results

OK, for a racist to accuse someone who objects to their racism as an apologist is using the label out-of-context. Moreover, they are applying a label that is more approriately allocated to themselves. Typical cheap racist trick. :wink:

Oh come on, Brigadier. If I ask you to build me a brick built garage and you use timber, so I complain and refuse to accept your substitute, you claim that I'm being intolerant. You're on the wrong planet. I suggest that I am insisting on getting what I ordered, not some sub-standard...

Therefore it's quite appropriate to call someone who defends racism as an apologist. It's not applicable to call someone an apologist if they are objecting to racism. Is that case closed? Or do you want to emphasise that the racists were using the word in the wrong context?

The cemetery advertised themselves as a multi-denominational cemetery accomodating all faiths and religions. That means being aware of the various religious requirements and accomodating them. Whatever your view of this, it's unfair and improper to advertise oneself as something which you...

Not me, I'm as pure as the driven snow. 8) I thought it was obligatory in France. :o

He's behind you! Oh no he's not! Oh yes he is! Surely the definition of the word is not the point. If a word is used in the wrong context the semantics are meaningless. (Can I say that: "semantics are meaningless"?) Apologist - A person who argues in defense...

Are you not understanding me? :lol: :lol: :lol: Your credibility and your integrity is in tatters. :lol: :lol: I seem to think that Islam is ........... You've confused yourself. :lol: Why should you feel the need? Oh, of course it's your obsession with Islam, even though you...

Typical resort to racially offensive rants in the face of reason. Nothing changes. The only religion you have any opinion is Islam, and it's a very negative opinion. You exploit every opportunity to deride it. Foot, mouth come to mind? I knew if we engaged with you for long enough, it was...

The subtle difference is hamdyjack, I've never accused you of posting nothing of substance. Quite the contrary, I've often accused you of posting substantive racially offensive comments, worthy of a riposte. So I'm willing, content and ready to respond to your substantive racially offensive...

If the management of the multi-denominational cemetery had not been incompetent, there would have been no grounds for any complaint. Do you see the difference? As the council were incompetent and realised five days pior to the Gypsy funeral, and tried to correct their "cock-up" there were...

:lol: :lol:

Is that a challenge? :wink:

Let's take a step back and analyse what we know we know. Understand that there are some things that we don't know we know, but we can make a reasonably educated assumption. Accept that there are things we know we don't know, and can make some effort to find out. But there will always be things...

Sorry, big-all. It was potentially misleading, weren't it? I should have used a comma or two. "It looks like we're going to end up with more air time about who's being more offensive than the amount of air time about the original topic." Phew, didn't want to offend anyone. :wink:

Oh hum, it looks like we're going to end up with more air time about who's being more offensive than the OP. :cry:

Well researched, newboy.

Do you not see that you're disproving your own asumption by hanging on my every word?

Don't disagree with the Mods. It don't work, trust me. :wink: