Search results

But you are unable to present a single example of antiSemitism. Your words are devoid of any sense or meaning.

Israel, the government responsible for the IDF, and teaching in schools, like nothing more than exterminating non-Jews. The IDF like noting more than exterminating non-Jews. There have been many videos published showing IDF celebrating the killing of Palestinians.

Zionism is a racist ideology intent on ethnically cleansing the Arabs from the Levant, (Israel, Gaza, the West Bank, Lebanon., Jordan and Syria). Zionism, like other movements have its right. left and centrist factions. The current Israeli government is very much dominated by the extreme right...

As you said the beliefs, ambitions and actions of Zionists can be criticised. Only you, and other supporters of Zionism, are interpreting that criticism as hatred, or inciting hatred. Criticism and hatred are different. if you cannot tell the difference, you need to go back to school.

Presenting published beliefs and ambitions of a religion is not inciting hatred. It is factual, you fool. If the members of that religion are insulted or offended by their own published beliefs and ambitions, they need to amend their beliefs and ambitions so that they are not insulted or...

It really does not matter where I am, nor what country the web site exists, if I make factual statements insult the subjects of the factual information.

My comments are posted on a web site outside of the Netherlands. Therefore, IF my comments contravened the Hate Laws, the comments were posted outside of the Netherlands. But my comments do not contravene any Hate Laws by stating the published beliefs and ambitions of a religion. If you think...

Section 137 (The Hate Laws) are not covered by offences which are committed outside of the Netherlands. Thus your concern is irrelevant, Bull ****ter. And my comments do not contravene the Hate Laws by presenting facts.

a) No-one is inciting hatred by explaining the beliefs or ambitions of a religion. If you think I have incited hatred of Zionists, by all means post the evidence. b) No-one is insulting a religious group by explaining their belief. If you think I have insulted Zionists, please present the...

Looking at other discussions about Israel, I see am prevented from participating in any of those discussions. I am denied the ability to offer my opinion on the subjects of my choice. I am only allowed to participate on the subjects the forum chooses to allow. So there is no point in my being a...

France picks and chooses which style of religious dress it does not permit. Priests and nuns regularly wear clerical dress in public. Strictly speaking clerical dress is not allowed, but the one time that the law has been followed a hue and cry was initiated...

In most religions, suicide is either a sin or is not supported. e.g. Buddhism does not advocate suicide. Those following Judaism will be buried in a separate part of the cemetery. But Christianity sometimes accepts suicide, e.g. the wicked falling on their sword. But in general a suicide is...

There is definite difference between withdrawing life support, and ending a life that can exist without that support.

There are 26 Bishops and Arch Bishops in the House of Lords having a direct influence on UK laws. Sittings in Both H of P begin with prayer.

Criticising a religion is perfectly acceptable. Criticising racists is perfectly acceptable. It would appear making slanderous lies without proof is accepted in this forum. Making up silly alternative names for other members is allowed. So how come I am not allowed to participate in a thread...

If racism is an ideology practised by racists. It must be acceptable to criticise the ideology of racists, by referring to those racists, even naming them. It would be nonsensical to argue that they are a protected group, protected from fair criticism. Similarly, If Zionism is the belief held by...

So the wife of a councillor did not understand the offence or could not afford legal representation? So she pled guilty?

Precisely. She was not sentenced for "not caring". If 'not caring' was a reason for a jail term, Mottie would be serving a life sentence. All the Reform supporters would be behind bars. LOL. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/article/2024/jun/27/the-farage-faithful-know-hes-a-but-they-dont-care

Policing is by consent. When it becomes unequal domination of the civil population, depending on the ideology of the police, it is called totalitarianism. When the 'police' unite to cover their own crimes it is called corruption.

They are called soldiers or policemen and are expected to follow a code of behaviour. When they choose on who to visit violence, according to their own ideology, they become those who would do us harm.