Search results

While the direct consequence of a 50% reduction of atmospheric CO2 may not instantly kill every single plant on the planet overnight, the impact of removing even half of the flora to the ecosystem would be a catastrophe of a global scale. That is another reason why rational debate on this...

Plants require require water, light and CO2 to photosynthesise. The general formula for the process is: CO2 + 2 H2O + photons → (CH2O)n + H2O + O2 (carbon dioxide + water + light energy → carbohydrate + oxygen + water) If you remove, or significantly reduce any...

Blondini, Increasing a trace gas by 35% still makes it a trace gas. Also, CO2 is needed by plants to photosynthesise, a reduction of CO2 by 50% would kill every single plant on the planet. Atmospheric water vapour has a colossal impact on planetary warming, why aren't you going on about...

Fact - the Earth has been heating up and cooling down for the past four and a half billion years. Anything us puny humans have accomplished in the last 100 years is totally irrelevant on even the shortest of geological or even zoological scales. How long were dinosaurs tramping about...

What these global warming alarmists seem to forget is basic science. CO2 is a trace gas, please, just refer to your O-Level Chemistry text book before you start blaming Land Rover drivers for destroying the planet. The stone age didn't end because we ran out of stones, the oil age won't...