Search results

thank you ronnie

Thanks Ronnie. The beams are installed hence it would be difficult to put the pfc on. The torsion callc gives 0.1 additional utilisation but the total is less than 1.0 i am struggling if i should ask the builder to move the beams to align with the center of the walls but with outstand and lack...

All thank you. This is the other end. It is fully beared to the internal wall. The bearing is not a problem as Padstones are to be placed. The problem are which options to choose 1 to keep as it is now but accept the eccentric loading from the cavity wall above, or 2 move the beams to align...

Builder said it would be better for him to put padstones afterwards. The span is 6 m hence 2 big 254x146x43 ub. I have two options 1 leave as is but accept the additional torsion, option 2 move the beams cejtric but accept the outstand

Yes a calculation including the extra torsion from eccentric cavity wall and minor axis bending gives 0.1 additional utilisation ratio. The as designed beam without eccentric ity has .81 utilisation ratio.

The beams were install ed already. It was designed without eccentric ity with usage of 0.8. the torsion will lead to 10percent usage. I suppose it will still work but not ideal. Would it be better to have the outstand and the load are centric?

I have a 254x146x43 steel beam sitting along a block inner wall of 100 mm wide and 300 mm long at one end. So it is about 23 mm stick out on both wings. On top of the beam, I will have a block inner wall of 100 mm wide to the whole beam length as well. Builder think that the beam width and...