Search results

I can't see where I am. Did you see words I didn't write when you read my post?

If anybody is taking an argument to stupid extremes it would be you in suggesting that believing that people should be properly rewarded for working is somehow a belief that the minimum wage should be £100/hour. Have you looked at the evidence which shows that if you pay people properly (and by...

I don't know if any makers offer one, (I believe they've all had reliability issues), but a semi-auto .22 WinMag, e.g. an AR-15, would be legal in the UK, as the legislation is worded around .22" rimfire, with no further distinctions. Dunno how dubious the FEO would be though...

Can't argue with that.

Ooh, let me see now ...

I was talking about use of force, not in self-defence, by an arresting officer. If the arrest he's carrying out is unlawful, is his use of force?

If the order isn't lawful is the use of force?

So why, when MNW67 posted about the legality of the shooting did you reply that he was ?

Are being smug and not terrified grounds for being shot?

Imagine...

So which is it? Shot for blocking the road and parking illegally, or shot for driving at an officer?

The ones who are have been blocked from investigating.

How far is that from the truth?

There are quite a few people here who can see the big picture. But the trouble is that they love what they see - they absolutely love it. They pretend to be defenders of democracy and then get all moist over somebody destroying it.

I thought it was spelled "pinchass"?

And some fools think that they can try and claim that "Is this the same London whose murder rate was being compared to NYC not long ago, or another one?" was not an attempt to deny the truth. We can always tell when you realise you've lost the argument.

Even if she was blocking the road, and was parked illegally, the penalties for those do not include summary execution with no trial.