Search results

Would a socket there be useful?

Mmm. I'm not so sure. I imagine the bulk of the cost of a battery will be the lithium cells in it, and given how many of those are being made already, I doubt there's much scope for economies-of-scale reductions. An increased market might tempt other manufacturers to launch products and shave...

Generally designed for back-fed generation. | Not generally designed for back-fed generation. :unsure:

No but seriously - what do you mean by "proper earth", and what type of supply do you have?

Where the last one before it enters your house is.

Thanks. I was beginning to wonder if I'd imagined it.

Have we seen anything regarding the law? But according to that spec you do not have any compliant households.

No, of course not. If some circuits serve rooms in one dwelling, and some serve rooms in another, that's definitely not sharing the CU between two dwellings. Who on earth would think it was?

To have your "own <whatever>" requires it to not be shared. You'll just keep repeating the same false ideas. Of course it is. Don't be ridiculous. It's a ridiculous one.

And I know where you going wrong, but whether deliberately or incompetently I don't know. You are conflating ownership and exclusivity. If you and your brother don't share a bedroom, and somebody were to ask you if you had your own room, and you said yes, how would you regard criticism of that...

Over 122kV for Test 2.

Not quite sure what the value of these tests was, except to be interesting

The spec mandates that the assembly instructions include this: Where can a customer go to find out the definition of "qualified electrician" so that they may be sure that whoever they engage is one?

It's positing the idea that you can have a topology of multiple "circuits" originating from a wired fuse, and that said fuse is not providing "individual protection" to each "circuit", but if you were to simply replace the wired fuse with an MCB, but leave the "circuit" wiring completely...

You can stop claiming that there is nothing wrong with what they wrote.

Except when it comes to the word "own", then you no longer agree. I'm not sure why you are going on about "household". I accept that in that spec they have redefined it to give it a meaning which is different to the real one. I don't know why (although I suspect it's because they started...

Of course you don't. And why should you? It is 100% impossible and 100% unheard of for circuits to be grouped together and protected by one MCB or RCBO - it simply cannot be done.

OK everyone, don't get your panties in knot. I saw a video of it being done, and I was curious, that's all.

I wonder what definition of "circuit" they are using which leads to a wired fuse possibly having more than one? Is it authoritative? You find it highly unlikely that an incorrect definition would have got past all the detailed stages of writing and proof reading, therefore you must find it...

The meaning of any requirement/instruction/whatever can only be based on the meanings of the words used to construct it. I am using the definitions of words which exist in dictionaries and normal use. You are trying to use definitions which are not those. You may not validly do that. If...