Hi, I'm looking for a bit of advice on heating a living room. It is a 1950s house with a carpeted concrete floor which always feels cold up to mid calf, if you can get your feet up on the sofa it's not quite as bad.
I've been thinking about under floor heating (wet) and whether that would be any good. It would have to be retro fit so the floor would need to be dug up. I'm not sure if the benefit would out weigh the cost. I've also read that it can take a long time to heat up but I've not found any times, has anyone had it fitted in a living room would it be suitable?
The current radiator is a double approx 1400 x 600 and the room is about 3.8 x 4.2 with high ceilings and an open fireplace. The radiator is behind the sofa on an inside wall which isn't ideal. I've also looked at those tall designer rads as they could be placed out of the way of the sofa but their output is a lot less so would need at least 2. Are they better or worse at heat convection than traditional rads as they are 6ft high so wasn't sure if it would just end up heating the ceiling.
Any advice much appreciated.
I've been thinking about under floor heating (wet) and whether that would be any good. It would have to be retro fit so the floor would need to be dug up. I'm not sure if the benefit would out weigh the cost. I've also read that it can take a long time to heat up but I've not found any times, has anyone had it fitted in a living room would it be suitable?
The current radiator is a double approx 1400 x 600 and the room is about 3.8 x 4.2 with high ceilings and an open fireplace. The radiator is behind the sofa on an inside wall which isn't ideal. I've also looked at those tall designer rads as they could be placed out of the way of the sofa but their output is a lot less so would need at least 2. Are they better or worse at heat convection than traditional rads as they are 6ft high so wasn't sure if it would just end up heating the ceiling.
Any advice much appreciated.