Dr Andrew Wakefield and the MMR vaccine

Sponsored Links
The fact that Japan's autism rates have not declined despite them not trialling the vaccine is of no consolation or assurance to me, because evidence shows autism rates have been increasing worldwide, year on year, so for all we spend on vaccinations it doesn't seem to be doing us much good, does it ?
We do not vaccinate against autism.
There is no link between vaccines and autism, so I fail to see why you made this statement. This has been studied by numerous groups, over many studies.

Surely, the correlation between vaccines, and the things they prevent is the thing you should be interested in? Remember polio?

If I was a concerned parent (god forbid) I would choose not to have my child vaccinated, not because I understand the science, but because there are an ever increasing number of unhealthy, diseased and retarded adults and children in society, all dependant on pharmaceutical support, and the health authorities don't seem to understand why autism rates are increasing, yet they are often overly keen to throw expensive treatments at them (which often just mask or reduce symptoms) This should send alarm bells ringing.
Your ignorance and lack of ethics are noted.

Link me to credible studies showing there is no harm from vaccinations.

Noted? By who? You ? Do you expect me to care what you think of what I think ? I don't. I believe you are the ignorant one. Happy to have a child's veins filled with filth when studies are AT BEST conflicting. Happy for government to deny justice to parents that have children that go on to develop autism from a vaccination. You are the ignorant one with no ethics.
 
There are those here that don't seem to want to acknowledge this.
What, that we have managed to eradicate harmful diseases through medicine and a thorough vaccination process?

Harmful diseases have reduced due to better sanitation and better nutrition, not vaccinations, donkey brain. The pharmasetuical industry is a business first and foremost.
 
Happy to have a child's veins filled with filth
Well there's an interesting view.

How many of the kids down your way ended up in iron lungs, or scarred with smallpox (if they survived).

Is it, er, none?
 
Sponsored Links
Happy to have a child's veins filled with filth
Well there's an interesting view.

How many of the kids down your way ended up in iron lungs, or scarred with smallpox (if they survived).

Is it, er, none?

.jpg
 
Harmful diseases have reduced due to better sanitation and better nutrition
Got a citation for that bucko?
Link me to credible studies showing there is no harm from vaccinations

No one is saying that a vaccine has never caused harm.

Some people have adverse reactions to them. But on the whole they have improved the health of human kind.
 
Link me to credible studies showing there is no harm from vaccinations.
Read this sponge brain...http://www.vaccinateyourbaby.org/safe/index.cfm

A link to ''The College Of Physicians of Philadelphia'' - a non-profict organisation that just happens to recieve corporate grants....

http://www.historyofvaccines.org/content/donors

Oh look, none other than glaxosmithkline (a British pharmaceutical company)

Oh

But of course they wouldn't have a vested interest in influencing ''our aim to educate the public on the history of vaccines.'' ...

''Corporate contributions are in the form of educational grants. Agreements with corporate contributors specify that donors do not have review of or control over the content or policies of The History of Vaccines.''

http://www.historyofvaccines.org/content/donors :ROFLMAO:

.... and Tony Blair was the peace keeper of the middle east ...
 
Link me to credible studies showing there is no harm from vaccinations.
Read this sponge brain...http://www.vaccinateyourbaby.org/safe/index.cfm

A link to ''The College Of Physicians of Philadelphia'' - a non-profict organisation that just happens to recieve corporate grants....

http://www.historyofvaccines.org/content/donors

Oh look, none other than glaxosmithkline (a British pharmaceutical company)

Oh

But of course they wouldn't have a vested interest in influencing ''our aim to educate the public on the history of vaccines.'' ...

''Corporate contributions are in the form of educational grants. Agreements with corporate contributors specify that donors do not have review of or control over the content or policies of The History of Vaccines.''

http://www.historyofvaccines.org/content/donors :ROFLMAO:

.... and Tony Blair was the peace keeper of the middle east ...
Does your tin foil hat stop you from getting ill? Is that why you don't believe in vaccinations?
 
A link to ''The College Of Physicians of Philadelphia'' - a non-profict organisation that just happens to recieve corporate grants....

http://www.historyofvaccines.org/content/donors

Oh look, none other than glaxosmithkline (a British pharmaceutical company)

Oh

But of course they wouldn't have a vested interest in influencing ''our aim to educate the public on the history of vaccines.'' ...

''Corporate contributions are in the form of educational grants. Agreements with corporate contributors specify that donors do not have review of or control over the content or policies of The History of Vaccines.''

http://www.historyofvaccines.org/content/donors :ROFLMAO:

.... and Tony Blair was the peace keeper of the middle east ...
Who do you think funds scientific research?
Most research funding comes from two major sources, corporations (through research and development departments) and government (primarily carried out through universities and specialized government agencies; often known as research councils). Some small amounts of scientific research are carried out (or funded) by charitable foundations, especially in relation to developing cures for diseases such as cancer, malaria and AIDS.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Funding_of_science
 
Link me to credible studies showing there is no harm from vaccinations.
Read this sponge brain...http://www.vaccinateyourbaby.org/safe/index.cfm

Ah, ok, I will. So here goes...

http://www.ecbt.org/index.php/about/article/scientific_advisory_board

The ECBT takes recommendations from the ACIP (Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices)
Here : http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/committee/members.html

Is a list of their serving members and ''non-members''

''The ACIP consists of 15 experts who are voting members and are responsible for making vaccine recommendations. The Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) selects these members after an application, interview, and nomination process. Fourteen of the members have expertise in vaccinology, immunology, pediatrics, internal medicine, nursing, family medicine, virology, public health, infectious diseases, and/or preventive medicine; one member is a consumer representative who provides perspectives on the social and community aspects of vaccination.

In addition to the 15 voting members, ACIP includes 8 ex officio members who represent other federal agencies with responsibility for immunization programs in the United States, and 30 non-voting representatives of liaison organizations that bring related immunization expertise.

Members and representatives serve on the Committee voluntarily.''
http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/about.html


Ah.. just quickly, let's have a quick look at a typical vaccination schedule being rolled out across american right now..

http://familydoctor.org/dam/familydoctor/documents/2015adultimmslong.pdf (approved by the AAFP - just one of the ''non-voting bodies'' that happen to sit on the ACIP)

''Report all clinically significant postvaccination reactions to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). Reporting forms and instructions on filing a VAERS
report are available at
www.vaers.hhs.gov

or by telephone, 800-822-7967.
Information on how to file a Vaccine Injury Compensation Program claim is available at
www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation

or by telephone, 800-338-2382. To file a
claim for vaccine injury, contact the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, 717 Madison Place, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20005; telephone, 202-357-6400.''

So there's a procedure for compensation... I thought vaccinations were safe ?!?!?!.. So let's have a look at https://vaers.hhs.gov/index ...

''The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is a national vaccine safety surveillance program co-sponsored by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). VAERS is a post-marketing safety surveillance program, collecting information about adverse events (possible side effects) that occur after the administration of vaccines licensed for use in the United States.

VAERS provides a nationwide mechanism by which adverse events following immunization may be reported, analyzed, and made available to the public. VAERS also provides a vehicle for disseminating vaccine safety-related information to parents and guardians, health care providers, vaccine manufacturers, state vaccine programs, and other constituencies.''


... oh dear, did someone mention the FDA? (THE FOOD AND DRUG A.D.M.I.N.I.S.T.R.A.T.I.O.N) They would have no vested interest in censoring and manipulating data would they???.. Of course they wouldn't ...

Oh look, just the index page ... https://vaers.hhs.gov/data/index

''When evaluating data from VAERS, it is important to note that for any reported event, no cause-and-effect relationship has been established. Reports of all possible associations between vaccines and adverse events (possible side effects) are filed in VAERS. Therefore, VAERS collects data on any adverse event following vaccination, be it coincidental or truly caused by a vaccine. The report of an adverse event to VAERS is not documentation that a vaccine caused the event.''

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. People just die all the time of course, it's a conicidence. Wait a minute, were side effects not mentioned just a paragraph ago ???

Let's move on then..

the next two paragraphs from the same link ...

''More than 10 million vaccines per year are given to children less than 1 year old, usually between 2 and 6 months of age. At this age, infants are at greatest risk for certain medical adverse events, including high fevers, seizures, and sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). Some infants will experience these medical events shortly after a vaccination by coincidence.

These coincidences make it difficult to know whether a particular adverse event resulted from a medical condition or from a vaccination. Therefore, vaccine providers are encouraged to report all adverse events following vaccination, whether or not they believe the vaccination was the cause.''

Ahahahaha, yup. Again, it's just a conicidence. It's not related to the vaccination(s) because we say it isn't, just believe us. We have no evidence from proper trials or studies, just believe us and not those nasty conspiracy theorists/ tin foil hat wearers. Asking questions is bad for your health.
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top