And on we go further down the page ...
"Underreporting" is one of the main limitations of passive surveillance systems, including VAERS. The term, underreporting refers to the fact that VAERS receives reports for only a small fraction of actual adverse events. The degree of underreporting varies widely. As an example, a great many of the millions of vaccinations administered each year by injection cause soreness, but relatively few of these episodes lead to a VAERS report. Physicians and patients understand that minor side effects of vaccinations often include this kind of discomfort, as well as low fevers. On the other hand, more serious and unexpected medical events are probably more likely to be reported than minor ones, especially when they occur soon after vaccination, even if they may be coincidental and related to other causes.
Recorded or not recorded at all... does it really matter eh ? Death and injury is just a concidence according to VAERS... Oh, and also don't worry about disease that develops some months/years outside the parameters of VAERS... these dieases will have developed a long time after having been vaccinated, so they can't possibly be related,..... right ... ? Anyone yet failed to notice the multiple admissions listed in just a few paragraphs that claim vaccinations do cause a whole spectrum of side effects ?
And on we go..
A report to VAERS generally does not prove that the identified vaccine(s) caused the adverse event described. It only confirms that the reported event occurred sometime after vaccine was given. No proof that the event was caused by the vaccine is required in order for VAERS to accept the report. VAERS accepts all reports without judging whether the event was caused by the vaccine.
Ahhh right. A nice little paragraph there casting doubt in the readers mind that vaccinations are attributable. Just speculative opinion of course, it's starting to sound like a broken record.
A different page now from VAERS https://vaers.hhs.gov/index/about/index
The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is a national vaccine safety surveillance program co-sponsored by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). VAERS is a post-marketing safety surveillance program that collects information about adverse events (possible side effects) that occur after the administration of vaccines licensed for use in the United States.
Oh... a ''post-marketing safety surveillance program'', or experiment you could say. Injecting vaccinations on mass, having not established that they are even safe.. makes total sense. Who cares if a few thousand children/adults develop mutilations or die in the process ..
And on we go...
''VAERS receives around 30,000 reports annually, with 13% classified as serious (e.g., associated with disability, hospitalization, life-threatening illness or death) (CDC VAERS Master Search Tool, April 2, 2008). Since 1990, VAERS has received over 200,000 reports, most of which describe mild side effects such as fever. Very rarely, people experience serious adverse events following immunization. By monitoring such events, VAERS helps to identify any important new safety concerns and thereby assists in ensuring that the benefits of vaccines continue to be far greater than the risks.
Many different types of adverse events occur after vaccination. About 85-90% of the reports describe mild adverse events such as fever, local reactions, and episodes of crying or mild irritability. The remaining reports reflect serious adverse events involving life-threatening conditions, hospitalization, permanent disability, or death, which may or may not have been caused by a vaccine.''
So there are risks, but there aren't risks, anyway don't worry just leave it to us... Ahahahahahah, and I'm the ignorant one ? Let's not forget :
''The degree of underreporting varies widely. As an example, a great many of the millions of vaccinations administered each year by injection cause soreness, but relatively few of these episodes lead to a VAERS report.''
I'm sure there's no foul play in terms of how the data is colllected, compiled and categorised by the way .....
Fancy having a look ?? ..................
https://vaers.hhs.gov/data/data
Balls back in your court donkey brain (or for anyone in the same court)
p.s I really enjoyed picking that to pieces
"Underreporting" is one of the main limitations of passive surveillance systems, including VAERS. The term, underreporting refers to the fact that VAERS receives reports for only a small fraction of actual adverse events. The degree of underreporting varies widely. As an example, a great many of the millions of vaccinations administered each year by injection cause soreness, but relatively few of these episodes lead to a VAERS report. Physicians and patients understand that minor side effects of vaccinations often include this kind of discomfort, as well as low fevers. On the other hand, more serious and unexpected medical events are probably more likely to be reported than minor ones, especially when they occur soon after vaccination, even if they may be coincidental and related to other causes.
Recorded or not recorded at all... does it really matter eh ? Death and injury is just a concidence according to VAERS... Oh, and also don't worry about disease that develops some months/years outside the parameters of VAERS... these dieases will have developed a long time after having been vaccinated, so they can't possibly be related,..... right ... ? Anyone yet failed to notice the multiple admissions listed in just a few paragraphs that claim vaccinations do cause a whole spectrum of side effects ?
And on we go..
A report to VAERS generally does not prove that the identified vaccine(s) caused the adverse event described. It only confirms that the reported event occurred sometime after vaccine was given. No proof that the event was caused by the vaccine is required in order for VAERS to accept the report. VAERS accepts all reports without judging whether the event was caused by the vaccine.
Ahhh right. A nice little paragraph there casting doubt in the readers mind that vaccinations are attributable. Just speculative opinion of course, it's starting to sound like a broken record.
A different page now from VAERS https://vaers.hhs.gov/index/about/index
The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is a national vaccine safety surveillance program co-sponsored by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). VAERS is a post-marketing safety surveillance program that collects information about adverse events (possible side effects) that occur after the administration of vaccines licensed for use in the United States.
Oh... a ''post-marketing safety surveillance program'', or experiment you could say. Injecting vaccinations on mass, having not established that they are even safe.. makes total sense. Who cares if a few thousand children/adults develop mutilations or die in the process ..
And on we go...
''VAERS receives around 30,000 reports annually, with 13% classified as serious (e.g., associated with disability, hospitalization, life-threatening illness or death) (CDC VAERS Master Search Tool, April 2, 2008). Since 1990, VAERS has received over 200,000 reports, most of which describe mild side effects such as fever. Very rarely, people experience serious adverse events following immunization. By monitoring such events, VAERS helps to identify any important new safety concerns and thereby assists in ensuring that the benefits of vaccines continue to be far greater than the risks.
Many different types of adverse events occur after vaccination. About 85-90% of the reports describe mild adverse events such as fever, local reactions, and episodes of crying or mild irritability. The remaining reports reflect serious adverse events involving life-threatening conditions, hospitalization, permanent disability, or death, which may or may not have been caused by a vaccine.''
So there are risks, but there aren't risks, anyway don't worry just leave it to us... Ahahahahahah, and I'm the ignorant one ? Let's not forget :
''The degree of underreporting varies widely. As an example, a great many of the millions of vaccinations administered each year by injection cause soreness, but relatively few of these episodes lead to a VAERS report.''
I'm sure there's no foul play in terms of how the data is colllected, compiled and categorised by the way .....
Fancy having a look ?? ..................
https://vaers.hhs.gov/data/data
Balls back in your court donkey brain (or for anyone in the same court)
p.s I really enjoyed picking that to pieces
Last edited:
