- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 14,544
- Reaction score
- 2,173
- Country
Why would hackers target them less?
Mac is less than 6% of the market. But there are plenty of Mac trojen's out there e.g. Mac Defefender
Why would hackers target them less?
What is the graph showing? Ownership or hacking hits? It wouldn't explain why they are targeted less per unit.
Mac is less than 6% of the market. But there are plenty of Mac trojen's out there e.g. Mac Defefender
Surely hackers chase anything vulnerable?market share. I think windows sucks btw - I'm a mac and mint fan, but its wrong to think your mac is somehow more secure. People just can't be bothered to chase 6%
Quantity, not quality Hackers tend to try and go for max amount of disturbance etc, not bother with a small percentage.Surely hackers chase anything vulnerable?
What a truly sh**y business.Quantity, not quality.
What was that you wrote recently about vague posts?What a truly sh**y business.
Surely hackers chase anything vulnerable?
Eh? WTF?? I merely said hacking is a truly shoity business. What's your real problem Blighty?What was that you wrote recently about vague posts?
It's ok bud. I know very little about the dark computer world.Stick to sawing roof wood and digging holes mate. Sorry Boyo.
Highlighting the quantity and quality bit didn't make sense with your comment.Eh? WTF?? I merely said hacking is a truly shoity business. What's your real problem Blighty?
Nah, but macs become obsolete when they become no longer supported. Eventually nothing much works on them. I've an old apple laptop which I keep purely because I have photoshop on it, it's the only thing left on it that works!With a Mac It won't gradually slow down as it gets older like windows machines do.
I can see why you associated me with EFLI now.Highlighting the quantity and quality bit didn't make sense with your comment.