Your total lack of an answer proves one simple fact: you dont have one.
so which part is not well documented by media and by other people.......
You are meandering off on your virtual reality journey, as usual.
If I said, "people have been to the moon They discovered it really was made of cheese."
Part of my comment is factual, the rest is lunacy.
But you have done exactly that, taken a part, a tiny part of Mitchell's article, and with it, presented your so-called evidence to refute my claim.
You choose to ignore the rest of the ludicrous comments.
The party and I have never agreed on much,
from gasbag's reference.
One has to ask, "why did he remain a Labour MP?"
Obvious, is it not?
He was in a labour stronghold and an MP of any other party would not have been re-elected.
He placed his personal ambition and desire to remain an MP over and above his political beliefs, and now he is attacking that party, and its political agenda, with which he disagreed with all the time he was an MP.
Perhaps eccentric was too fine a description for him. Turncoat, exploiter, etc may be more appropriate descriptions.