Search results

Why do you think the increased population raises carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere? Do you mean because humans breathe in oxygen and breathe out carbon dioxide?

Do you agree that the measurements taken with instruments (over the past 60+ years) are accurate?

I've tried before. Never found any. Are you saying the current measurements of carbon dioxide levels might be wrong?

Where do you think all the carbon dioxide from burning fossil fuels has gone, if not into the atmosphere?

Examples?

Remember to join the extractor hood to the vent pipe.

It is massively hypocritical. And it also distracts from the much more important discussion to be had about the science. Lots of people still claim global warming is all a con, but sometimes go quiet when asked to go into specifics. A couple of days ago you and I were having a decent...

There's certainly a lot of hypocrisy. But how does that alter the facts or the science?

And that the above was the unlawful act which could lead to manslaughter.

When you can't argue the facts or the science, distract and deflect. By the way, I'm pretty sure that was Davos, not the climate conference.

Is it possible that what she did could be a common assault or a Public Order offence e.g. if the cyclist thought she was going to be pushed off her bike.

The letter referred to was written in 1993 by SEPP, and was signed by a very small number of meteorologists, 50 out of more than 10,000 in the American Meteorological Society (AMS). There's an article here about these claims...

I was just about to follow on with ZZ Top but you deleted yours.

That seems to be a letter from a random GP, more than twenty five years ago! Things have moved on quite a bit. Very few scientists still try to deny that warming is happening. Now it's more about trying to think of reasons not to deal with it. I've heard it called climate change deflection...

Was he the one who kept confusing the pink and the yellow? Easy mistake to make!

That's a bit disappointing. I thought we were having a good and sensible discussion about the science.

It seems very simple to me. Human activity has increased the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere by about fifty percent. Therefore it is trapping more heat. Therefore the planet has warmed.

Do you agree with physicists, who have known for almost two hundred years, that certain gases absorbs infra red radiation and this causes them to heat up?

So, essentially, a rejection of science.

Are you comparing physicists to conspiracy theorists?