D
dextrous
I know that Union issues are being discussed on another forum, notable that relating to Corus' unfortunate position. This is a different issue though which came up a few weeks ago (on Radio 4 anyway)
Should a person be paid a different wage/salary for exactly the same job, depending on local living costs? For example, housing prices in London are greater than Manchester. So, if one is on £30K in London, then (before we even look at the price of bread), someone doing exactly the same job in Manchester will be better off - as in have more disposable income.
The unions are dead against this, and I can't for the life of me understand why!
Should a person be paid a different wage/salary for exactly the same job, depending on local living costs? For example, housing prices in London are greater than Manchester. So, if one is on £30K in London, then (before we even look at the price of bread), someone doing exactly the same job in Manchester will be better off - as in have more disposable income.
The unions are dead against this, and I can't for the life of me understand why!