Confiteor said:
Or does this mad rule about not adding to older posts preclude us from finding out if this stuff works?
Confiteor, welcome to the forums, its nice to know you have read the forum rules
but since the post you replied to is under a month old you are not breaking any rules.
We have this particular rule because often people will ask (as you have) did xyz work, trouble is quite often the original poster never replies, take
this post for example, started in June 2002 "finished" in October 2002, then replied to in January 2003, and again in March 2004 (no other posts between) and again in August 2004
Did the first poster ever reply? NO
I really do hope that Henry_the_Chimp (who started post) does reply, but as yet he has only made 2 posts (both here) so i will cross my fingers for you
This is only one such example there are others, so in answer to the other part of your question
Confiteor said:
I know I'm new here, but can the powers that be please rethink that rule in particular?
We have thought, and it stays