Another equal question:
Would you assassinate President Trump to prevent 100 million people dying from drowning, disease and famine as a result of man-made climate change?
Would you ?
Another equal question:
Would you assassinate President Trump to prevent 100 million people dying from drowning, disease and famine as a result of man-made climate change?
only if the child volunteered understanding that by his death millions would be saved. but to kill a child with out , no.
Would you eliminate the whole human population because it has become the ultimate plague and will eventually destroy the earth?Another equal question:
Would you assassinate President Trump to prevent 100 million people dying from drowning, disease and famine as a result of man-made climate change?
How would you know,100% certain,it would work?Do you think that a child is able to make that decision?
possibly not.Do you think that a child is able to make that decision?
If it was absolutely proven that killing one child would save the lives of millions ,why not.I listen to it on the radio they have been on about this Saudi caper
Leaving thT to one side a question that came up was
" Would you kill a child to cure cancer " ???
The intention is usually to show that you have no absolute moral imperative. It can be refined by graduating the genetic affinity you have with the victims.
Or unborn children perhaps.You'll notice that the examples you quote are "foreign" or of a different religion.
People who are "different" are often seen as less value.
Probably cover up for them, Catholic priests have been involved in the orchestration of terrorist attacks in N.Ieland which have killed children.Or if some one went into a catholic
Confession box and stated that they had planted a bomb some where what would the preist do ?
Probably cover up for them, Catholic priests have been involved in the orchestration of terrorist attacks in N.Ieland which have killed children.