C
cantaloup63
Infants are born free of any sin.
not acording to the catholic
it`s called orginal sin
it`s called orginal sin
C
cantaloup63
After a brief pause for reflection (yours, not mine 
), it's the concept of how we treat certain other peoples. We berate gypsies, immigrants, illegal immigrants, chavs, deliberate unemployed etc etc; and yet these "people" continue to procreate and nurture a continuation of their subclass.
Is it not time to either remove these children who have a basic human right of a decent parent, or enforce sterilisation?
), it's the concept of how we treat certain other peoples. We berate gypsies, immigrants, illegal immigrants, chavs, deliberate unemployed etc etc; and yet these "people" continue to procreate and nurture a continuation of their subclass.Is it not time to either remove these children who have a basic human right of a decent parent, or enforce sterilisation?
African tribes have murdered newborns for being evil for centuries.
Also...... didn't 'god' murder hundreds of newborns and firstborns for sin, because the pharoah had p*ssed off Moses.???
Iffy on the second one.
cantaloup63 said:
However appealing this idea might be, it contains a hidden danger. As you gradually breed out characteristics which are, on the face of it, undesirable, what else might accidentally be lost?
Trekkies are well aware of this as it has been a recurring theme. When Captain Kirk was split in a transporter accident, he discovered that he couldn't function as captain without his 'wild' half. If you could somehow breed out greed, selfishness and anger (I decline to use the word 'aggression' because it has too many different meanings) you might suddenly find yourself with no leaders, no inventors, and no entrepreneurs.
As I once said in another thread, the scum will always be with us. For better or worse they are in our DNA.
LastMagicBean said:
I'm not sure about that but, if you believe the bible, God did commit the first recorded act of genocide. Only Noah and his wife survived.
Oddly enough, I've yet to find a Christian who can justify that particular atrocity. 
C
cantaloup63
Alright, I concede the bit about infants being born free of sin.
Move it onto the idea that they are at least free from nurture and should be kept that way.
@Space cat - an interesting argument which as we all know is somewhat difficult to either qualify or quantify (not that my own second post isn't either )
That's the trouble with tribbles
Move it onto the idea that they are at least free from nurture and should be kept that way.
@Space cat - an interesting argument which as we all know is somewhat difficult to either qualify or quantify (not that my own second post isn't either
)That's the trouble with tribbles
So when did it all go wrong for you cantaloup63?
C
cantaloup63
At your conception
- Joined
- 2 Oct 2006
- Messages
- 6,655
- Reaction score
- 290
- Country
'Sin'?! That's an interesting word to use from a man that, to my knowledge anyway, renounces religion.
C
cantaloup63
When in Rome...
- Joined
- 2 Oct 2006
- Messages
- 6,655
- Reaction score
- 290
- Country
C
cantaloup63
That would be nice - white emulsion over the Sistene Chapel and some woodchip on the walls. 
One could be somewhat more sinister regarding what goes on in the Vatican regarding young and innocent children, and the Holey (deliberate mis-spelling) Roman Cathartic Church. But this sort of comment tended to have me removed in the past, so I shall repent and recant the gayville, er, devil.
One could be somewhat more sinister regarding what goes on in the Vatican regarding young and innocent children, and the Holey (deliberate mis-spelling) Roman Cathartic Church. But this sort of comment tended to have me removed in the past, so I shall repent and recant the gayville, er, devil.
- Joined
- 2 Oct 2006
- Messages
- 6,655
- Reaction score
- 290
- Country
The tangents in this forum never fail to depress me.
