Whereas with (2), you rightly say that one has to ensure that the loop impedance is low enough to guarantee operation of the MCB under fault conditions, in terms of the adequacy of the the CSA of the CPC (determined by an adiabatic calculation), the need is to ensure that the loop impedance is high enough for the CPC's CSA to be adequate. Combining those two, one therefore has to ensure that the loop impedance is between the minimum (for CPC) and the maximum (for MCB operation).
Not sure I follow.
As I see it, there is a need for the loop impedance to be
low enough that the OPD will operate before the cable overheats.
As EFLImpudence points out, with a short cable, the impedance is low even for a small cable, and the OPD will operate quickly. As the cable gets longer, so the impedance increases, the fault current
reduces, and the OPD may take longer to operate. There may come a point where the OPD takes long enough to operate that the cable may overheat.
I strongly suspect that for
most domestic circuits, the loop impedance required for reliable OPD operation is a limiting factor before the heat issue comes into play - this may be a case where it matters.
Eg, since the running current of the compressor is only 13A, one may be tempted to fit a 16A breaker and use (say) 1.5mm^2 cable. A B curve will trip pretty well every time the compressor starts which would be "inconvenient". So the user then fits a C curve breaker, and possibly even a D curve breaker. All will trip "quickly" if the cable is short enough and it's a dead short near the supply end - but I can't help thinking that with enough length of cable, a D curve in particular could let an awful lot of energy through before it trips.
One case where the user might swap the breaker would be if the supply was originally for a different load, with a low start up surge. The supply then gets re-used for a different purpose - user things "16A is 16A" but perhaps has heard "down the pub" that C or D curve breakers don't trip as fast.
It would also (as I think has already been said) depend on the load. If the compressor has a proper starter with overload then a stalled motor would trip the overload. Otherwise, it would remain stalled and reply on the breaker tripping - eventually.
But can you rely on the load when designing such a circuit ? Suppose the user has a "proper" compressor now - so the circuit is designed on the basis that there's an overload in the motor controls. The user then replaces the compressor, and the new one has no overload. Most users would have no idea - but now there is no load side overload protection.
As an aside, a mate did replace his compressor a few years ago - I bought his old (broken) one. The old one was 3 hp and plugged into a 13A socket. The new one was 4hp and was also plugged into a 13A socket

He found, by trial, that if he plugged it into an extension lead (say around 10m of 1.5mm^2 flex) that it didn't blow fuses. He asked me for help when he realised he'd "burned out" half of the sockets in the unit (switch failed internally due to overheating, when one went, he'd move the plug to another) and I arranged a hardwired supply for him.