Odd that concept of leaving the golf club, and having to carry on paying, yet not having an rights to the assets that you're being asked to pay for.
The EU (commission that is) knew that we were going to leave, well before we actually handed in our notice. On the same basis, there are a lot of people that are linked to the EU bureaucracy (and the commissioners and EU leaders themselves) that are saying to everyone that will listen, that we have agreed to certain projects up to 2020, and we should expect to continue with that support, and I can understand that thought process. But although there has been no formal demand for a "divorce" payment, as it's being suggested by various EU commissioners, I would think it's reasonable to consider that one will eventually be served on us.
What puzzles me, is the idea that's being bandied about that we also owe for pensions and all sort of other costs that anyone leaving their company, wouldn't be asked to pay for.
Apparently, the person that drafted article 50, admits that he screwed up not making the process more specific in terms of ongoing costs and commitments.