And what makes you imagine 50cm has any relevance to a SPD?Why do you say that out of interest? I note the cables are less than 50cm
And what makes you imagine 50cm has any relevance to a SPD?Why do you say that out of interest? I note the cables are less than 50cm
From where? Do they also state the required CSA of those conductors?Manufactures state and combined length of the L and E cable to spd should not be more than 50cm
Yes I know some do but any one with any radio knowledge will instantly know it's a pile of irrelevant s***eManufactures state and combined length of the L and E cable to spd should not be more than 50cm
The gauge is almost a secondary consideration when when dealing with transients, but obviously the thicker the better to deal with the potentially high voltages and hence currents involved.From where? Do they also state the required CSA of those conductors?
Kind Regards, John
Totally correct, as I mentioned before the professional way of doing the job is to terminate the feed into the SPD and then take the load (CU) from the SPD. The idea of botching the SPD onto the final part of the busbar, (after all other circuits take the hit first) is a ludicrouss schoolboy error. No I'll step back from that it demonstrates an almost total disregard of R&D and existing approved methods/procedures and certainly an ignorance of how current flows in aI thought the idea was to get it as close to the supply as possible, to ensure it can assist with the surge, rather than it go though the equipment you are trying to protect
I would think the same, which is why I asked you where the 50cm quoted is "measured from".I thought the idea was to get it as close to the supply as possible, to ensure it can assist with the surge, rather than it go though the equipment you are trying to protect
Since it's Friday evening, that comment moves me to think a little laterally.The gauge is almost a secondary consideration when when dealing with transients, but obviously the thicker the better to deal with the potentially high voltages and hence currents involved.
It seems my job is done...that comment moves me to think a little laterally.
Kind Regards, John
If that's the case, it would sound pretty meaningless and non-helpful. In addition to everything else, as Sunray has said, CSA (hence a reduction therein) is not a major issue in relation to transients.I believe it’s measured from the Mcb to the earth bar. Where the reduction in csa occurs. Looks like 6mm cable.
Good to see you, and I hope all is well with you and yours.1. There are 3 types of SPD. (1 is used for lightning protection, 2 is used to protect sensitive electrical and electronic equipment, 3 is used to protect safety critical equipment). They all provide a route to earth when a transient overvoltage (a spike in the supply which can damage the installation when it is not detected).
Fair enough. Do you know whether that means that some have built-in over-current protection and others don't, rather than that some manufacturers are happy to rely on protection by the cutout fuse, but others aren't?2. The presence of the MCB is dictated by the manufacturer. Some require an MCB and others don't.
As I've asked in this thread more than once, where is this 0.5m (or 1m) measured from? To measure it from the point of incoming supply to a CU/DB would be completely arbitrary, given that that place could be quite distant from the origin of the installation, is very commonly more than 0.5m, and not infrequently >1m. On the other hand, if one wanted it to be within 0.5m of the most upstream consumer-accessible part of the installation (the output terminals of the meter) that would in many/most cases mean that the SPD would have to be a standalone item, external to the CU/DBThe length of cable comes from BS7671, regulation 534.4.8 which states the total length of the cables (live + PE) should preferably be no longer than 0.5 metres, but should never be longer than 1 metre. I assume this is based on research to ensure the cables are not damaged during the spike.
I somewhat struggle to understand that. The length of a cable does not significantly influence its ability to survive high currents without damage - and, in fact, if anything the longer the conductors (hence higher their impedance) the (slightly) lower will be any current. I cannot think of any situation in which a shorter conductor would be more able to survive (without damage) a particular current than could a longer one - can you?I assume this is based on research to ensure the cables are not damaged during the spike.
Agreed.3. The position of the MCB/SPD is less than ideal, but is not that bad. There are 2 probabilities here. The first is that a transient overvoltage occurs - the SPD clears the fault and no equipment is damaged. The second is that the second RCD has tripped when the transient overvoltage occurs - the SPD won't clear the fault, but the damage will be limited to circuits protected by the first RCD.
As above, it only "addresses the cable length requirement" if that length is to be measured from the input of the CU - which, as I said is, in relation to the installation as a whole, merely an arbitrary location, hence seemingly leading to a meaningless requirement.FYI, a number of manufacturers are now making consumer units with an SPD built in linked to the main switch. This addresses the cable length requirement and also ensures the whole board is covered by the SPD.
I still have my copy of the DPC somewhere - I'll try to find it this evening.I think the draft for the next amendment made SPD a mandatory requirement, may be wrong here. I deleted the docs a few weeks ago and somebody may still have a copy.
If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.
Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.
Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local