• Looking for a smarter way to manage your heating this winter? We’ve been testing the new Aqara Radiator Thermostat W600 to see how quiet, accurate and easy it is to use around the home. Click here read our review.

Typical Labour. I’m alright Jack…..

Shared ownership converts to full ownership when the staircasing ends, withthis idea the property transfers back to tne Council. Im not convinced that would appeal to renters who would have no incentive to make money on it to sell at full market value. It would have to be via a long lease so tne Council could protect its asset if for example it was usedas a crack den or unauthorised works carried out.

Apart from in the example I gave. You could even give the renter a chance to buy out the discount within 10 years at the original value and pay nothing back at the end.

Probably wouldn’t work where prices are low.
 
Thatcher ring fenced the money from selling off council houses…..and forced councils to hand over the money so she could use to bribe voters with tax cuts
I thought the money raised from the sale of council houses was supposed to be used to build more council houses.
Didnt Thatcher say that.
 
I thought the money raised from the sale of council houses was supposed to be used to build more council houses.
Didnt Thatcher say that.

I understood the basic idea, was to limit councils continuing being landlords/a social housing provider?
 
Oh, well let’s just sell them all off and do nothing, eh?
No I was just pointing out a factor that has to be considered that will get worse the longer the tenant remains there. Essential maintenance needs to be ensured as well.

Having lived amongst them another type of person can crop up. Could afford a mortgage but do not want one. At the time these had no interest at all in owning a house.They saw it as a mugs game.
 
No I was just pointing out a factor that has to be considered that will get worse the longer the tenant remains there. Essential maintenance needs to be ensured as well

The house will be worth less then, so the owner will be shafting themselves of the RTB advantage they'd taken.


Having lived amongst them another type of person can crop up. Could afford a mortgage but do not want one. At the time these had no interest at all in owning a house.They saw it as a mugs game.

Hardly the ones who would be using RTB then :rolleyes:
 
No I was just pointing out a factor that has to be considered that will get worse the longer the tenant remains there. Essential maintenance needs to be ensured as well.

That would be a very wrong sort of character, to even consider buying their own property. Maintenance and repairs, are a constant, ongoing task, always something needs doing
Could afford a mortgage but do not want one. At the time these had no interest at all in owning a house.

Some people just don't want any responsibility, for their own welfare.

They saw it as a mugs game.

Much depends on the property itself. I was instrumental, in helping to persuade a friend and neighbour to buy their home, which I grew to slightly regret. For years, I had been the one to call, whenever their car had an issue, after the house was bought, I also became the one to call for any problems with the house too.
,
 
No I was just pointing out a factor that has to be considered that will get worse the longer the tenant remains there. Essential maintenance needs to be ensured as well.
Well, if it's a wreck, it will be valued accordingly and it wouldn’t be compulsory for them to buy it back.
Having lived amongst them another type of person can crop up. Could afford a mortgage but do not want one. At the time these had no interest at all in owning a house.They saw it as a mugs game.
They wouldn’t be the type I’d expect to buy a house then. Carry on renting, that’s who council houses are for.
 
Last edited:
Maybe look at council house management now. Afraid it's a few links. None are long.

Intent and funding

What is a leaseholder

If a leaseholder

My father's private property was built on council owned land as were the council houses. Given the cost of ground rent he had no interest in going freehold. I sorted that after my mother died a few years after my father did. At that point Solihull owned the land. Boundary changes so no way of knowing who originally bought the land or how.

The escape from being a leaseholder is to buy the land. I'd suspect this has happened on many ex council houses so they are no longer in the pool. This infers that increasing the pool again means land needs to be bought other than in areas they own that have a lot of green in them. High rises for instance may have.
 
Paying rent until the day you die for something you will never own, doesn't sound to smart either.

Everyone has to take a percentage, make a living. Those letting properties, have to make a profit, the letting agent has to make a profit, everytime a minor repair needs doing, which the homeowner might deal with himself, the workman called in - has to make a profit.

Buying and owning your own property is by far the cheaper option long term financial option, than renting, with all the profit which simply has to be made from the rented property.
 
By abolishing the right to buy, the government are just going to create ghettos.

They're already doing that. There is a council estate not far from me called Southmead (incidentally where Darth Vader AKA Dave Prowse grew up). It has always been white working class. In last few years it has rapidly started changing colour, mostly from THAT religion. Visiting the Aldi there is starting to feel like visiting a foreign country. Ghettoisation is well under way. Have a lot of sympathy for locals on the housing list in a city with ridiculously overpriced housing or those who bought their CHs on this estate.
 
Paying rent until the day you die for something you will never own, doesn't sound to smart either.

If you didn't use it (to live in, for example), I'd agree.

But you do live in it.


You pay for a holiday, to watch a movie: you own neither.


If you measure your life value only in what you own, you are missing out most of what life is.
 
Travelling through my local council estates I see plenty of flash cars on the drives, and personally know someone in one who gos on holiday twice a year. Seems to me that they can easily afford a mortgage. The shortage in council houses could be solved by kicking out the house hoggers who could rent private or get a mortgage.
 
Well, if it's a wreck, it will be valued accordingly and it wouldn’t be compulsory for them to buy it back.
If compulsory where does the council get the money from? What valuation? House prices increase even if just due to general inflation.

If repairs needed where does that money come from?

As soon as a council ceases to be one it no longer contributes to running the others.
 
Back
Top