National Grooming Gangs Inquiry Announced

Reform party supporters were angry that Labour werent going to hold a national enquiry and now they are angry because the Labour party are holding a national enquiry

ficker than the fickest mince :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:
 
majority of grooming is done by white men
In a country where the majority of men are white? No shìt Sherlock. What colour are groomers the majority in countries such as Pakistan, Kenya, India where the majority are not white?

Did you miss this:
LONDON, June 15 (Reuters) - British police will be ordered to record the ethnicity of gangs involved in organised child sexual abuse after a report on Monday detailed state failures to tackle the issue and a reluctance to recognise an "over-representation" of Asian men.

Do you know what 'over-representation' means?
 
let’s not forget Boris Johnson, who called spending money on investigating child sex abuse “spaffing money up the wall”. The Tories later made him prime minister...says Poly Toynbee in the Guardian - She goes on to remind y'all that the shadow home secretary, Chris Philp, tells Sky that “hundreds of people in positions of authority over the years deliberately covered this up. I think they are guilty of that criminal offence and frankly should be going to prison.” But who was the minister for crime and policing in the last government? He was. Kemi Badenoch was minister for children...from the data that has been recorded: 83% of suspects are white, 7% Asian, 5% black...those on the frontline worry that false facts draw attention away from where most child group sex abuse happens: 57% in institutions, 26% by group sex abusers within families, and 48% by other children

That 'report' isn't worth the paper it’s written on. Whenever you see a grooming gang caught, there’s at least half a dozen individuals, often more. That’s most peoples idea, including mine, of a grooming gang. The report defines a group based/network (grooming gang) as basically just "two or more individuals that are known to each other". That’s not a 'grooming gang' in anyone’s book unless like noseall they want to use pure statistics to prove a false point.
 
Baroness Casey has said that his report is not a true reflection of the perpetrators. In many cases race is not recorded.
During her investigations she even noted that the word Pakistani had been "tippexed out".
Good job they improved on that post 2021.
See table above. Ethnicity is clearly recorded.
 
Correct. Does anyone remember this absolute whopper...

"...It is not white British males committing the majority of rape abuse against kids, via rape gangs. There are plenty of official reports confirming this and I have posted them for the forum idiots to appraise themselves of..."
Read more

And all the supposed reports he linked to, showed the exact opposite. The bloke is just a lowly lying scumbag.
Motorbiking spent 100 pages trying to prove something that wasn’t true.
majority of grooming is done by white men

gas112 is an apologist who is still going to deny it

It might depend on how they define "grooming gangs" for the inquiry.

I remember when we had this topic a few months ago, and I was Googling, it seemed that there are often different patterns to child sexual abuse carried out by different demographics. The great majority of the groups who carry out child sex abuse are white men. But they are the more traditional British paedophile rings, and they often abuse much younger children, often in unbelievably horrific ways. The "grooming" of teenage girls on the street is mainly done by Asian men.
Yes disproportionally white for all child sex offences.
It's quite obvious that none of you understand the data or the reports that you rely on, with your "its all white British men". I'm not interested in arguing for 100 pages... but you really do need to thoroughly read the data that you are relying on.

Ak yourself:
- why would police NFA rape of an underage child?
- Why would such a rape result in discharge or caution?
- What do indecent image distribution offences have to do with grooming gangs?
- Do I understand what distribution of an indecent image is?

The police and courts are not in the habit of NFAing, cautioning or discharging serious grooming gang offences, so why would you lump these in with many thousands of less serious CSA/CSE offences? To hide the demographics perhaps or just sloppy work?

I tried unsuccessfully to explain this last time. If the majority of the data in your sample is irrelevant, the stats you produce will be too.
 
The word disproportionate has been used time and time again on the news since this rereport
Yes, as she said, it gets the racists excited. No surprise to see who is posting.
Taking samples from Pakistani communities will yield pockets of Pakistani offenders correct
Nationally - it shows offenders are mostly white.
 
It's quite obvious that none of you understand the data or the reports that you rely on, with your "its all white British men". I'm not interested in arguing for 100 pages... but you really do need to thoroughly read the data

I tried unsuccessfully to explain this last time.
Correct.
All the links you posted way back,when you told us idiots to "appraise ourselves of" all said the same thing. Group based rape gangs are predominantly white and by a large majority.
Keep flailing boyo.
 
Yes, as she said, it gets the racists excited. No surprise to see who is posting.
Taking samples from Pakistani communities will yield pockets of Pakistani offenders correct
Nationally - it shows offenders are mostly white.

At the end of the day noseall you need to start some type of petion asking for the report to be with drawn and certain wording redacted

That wording would be disproportionate
All refs to ethnicity
Migrants
Pakistani

I dare say there are some other like minded fruit cakes ( like you :giggle: ) who are uncomfortable with the wording / report and are getting a bit hot under the collar that will sign it:ROFLMAO:
 
There you go, that wasn't too difficult. Transam and denso in agreement.

Agree with you you having a :ROFLMAO:

Altering quotes hmmm bit of a habit of yours

A practice Transam does not take part in
Never have never will

Transam has High standards :cool::cool::cool:

Well certainly higher than yours any way
Although tbh that would not be difficult :giggle: :giggle: :giggle:
 
At the end of the day noseall you need to start some type of petion asking for the report to be with drawn and certain wording redacted

That wording would be disproportionate
All refs to ethnicity
Migrants
Pakistani

I dare say there are some other like minded fruit cakes ( like you :giggle: ) who are uncomfortable with the wording / report and are getting a bit hot under the collar that will sign it:ROFLMAO:
Oh hang in the word Asian needs to be redacted as well :cool: and ethnicity ;)
 
Just saw Casey and Chemi doing their respective bits on TV. Every confidence that Louise will deliver a thorough report, but doubt that the govt will implement all the recommendations. They didn't bother to do so with the Jay report. A lot of it is the incompetence/ under staffing of Plod or IT systems that are inadequate or don't talk to each other when sharing info. But improving IT doesn't get votes in what has become a political football that re form, with their complete lack of a track record, will benefit from.
 
Back
Top