National Grooming Gangs Inquiry Announced

[Deleted member 317777]

. It reported that, where ethnicity information was available, 28% (2011) and 75% (2013) of offenders had been recorded as "Asian"

Race and crime in the United Kingdom - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

@denso13 So it looks like its standard to miss out certain information,

 

[motorbiking]

I've not really been following this. But there was a figure once quoted in one of these reports which said something along the lines of 73% of group CSE was carried out by white men. How does that fit in here.

This is the bit the forum idiots are struggling with.

CSA / CSE offences are irrelevant in an argument about organised kiddie rape gangs.

 

[denso13]

Why the need for a disclaimer?

It's hardly a disclaimer.

 

[denso13]

. It reported that, where ethnicity information was available, 28% (2011) and 75% (2013) of offenders had been recorded as "Asian"

Race and crime in the United Kingdom - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

@denso13 So it looks like its standard to miss out certain information,

No, not miss out, it means you don't include something which doesn't exist

 

[Deleted member 317777]

It's hardly a disclaimer.

That’s exactly what it is.

You didn’t write the report, let it go, it’s worthless in this thread.

 

[Deleted member 317777]

No, not miss out, it means you don't include something which doesn't exist

That’s a lot of men who don’t know their ethnicity!!

It seems more than a little convenient

 

[denso13]

That’s exactly what it is

No it really isn't, you've got the wrong word completely.

 

[denso13]

That’s a lot of men who don’t know their ethnicity!!

It seems more than a little convenient

It doesn't say that. The conclusions really annoy you, don't they?

 

[Notch7]

CSA / CSE offences are irrelevant in an argument about organised kiddie rape gangs.

You mean in your opinion, because they don’t match your narrative

 

[Deleted member 317777]

It doesn't say that. The conclusions really annoy you, don't they?

No I just like all the facts, not just “some” of them.

Funny though, all other articles etc have the figure @10% plus. The one you’re clinging to, has it @2%

Very dishonest of you.

 

[Deleted member 317777]

No it really isn't, you've got the wrong word completely.

What word would you like me to use ?

 

[denso13]

Very dishonest of you.

Take it up with the authors.

 

[denso13]

What word would you like me to use ?

Footnote perhaps.

 

[motorbiking]

You mean in your opinion, because they don’t match your narrative

read post 377 what do you think its saying?
- 96.3% of the offences aren't related to organised kiddie rape gangs
- 1/4 are intra-familiar - 1/10 are institutional so strip those out.

So that leaves <2.8% of the data
2/3rd have no ethnicity data.

So you are left with <2% to analyse.

What conclusions can you make from less than 2% of the data.

 

[Deleted member 317777]

Take it up with the authors.

You’re well know for posting inaccurate information and claiming it’s correct