D
Deleted member 317777
What’s a foot note?Footnote perhaps.
What’s a foot note?Footnote perhaps.

There is nothing inaccurate about it. Just ignore it if you want, I don't really care.You’re well know for posting inaccurate information and claiming it’s correct

What’s a foot note?
It is inaccurate, it’s not about grooming gangs. So you’ve posted it to mislead/ lieThere is nothing inaccurate about it. Just ignore it if you want, I don't really care.

Then ignore itis inaccurate, it’s not about grooming gangs. So you’ve posted it to mislead/ lie
And even your post states information is missing.
I can’t, I don’t like misleading information.Then ignore it

Nothing misleading about it. It's true and accurate.I can’t, I don’t like misleading information.
But anyone with half a brain knows it’s BS and you didn’t read it.
So you agree it’s not about grooming gangs ?Nothing misleading about it. It's true and accurate.
This is the bit the forum idiots are struggling with.
CSA / CSE offences are irrelevant in an argument about organised kiddie rape gangs.

I have been clear all along that it covers all child sex exploitation.So you agree it’s not about grooming gangs ?
Thank you for admitting it.I have been clear all along that it covers all child sex exploitation.
Yeswhere

I've said it all along.Thank you for admitting it.
The threads about Grooming gangs, your post side tracked the issue and belittled the issue.
Say what you like, I’ve highlighted your inaccurate statement.I've said it all along.
White men are over represented in CSE offences, I'll continue to point that out

You do it if you likePut up a chart/stats for grooming gangs only ?