• Looking for a smarter way to manage your heating this winter? We’ve been testing the new Aqara Radiator Thermostat W600 to see how quiet, accurate and easy it is to use around the home. Click here read our review.

Angela rayner tax dodger again...

isn't it just more likely that she was given bad advice on a complex technical matter by a professional who was paid for his expertise.
Poor Lucy Connelly is innocent because she had a bad (she claims) adviser, Ange is guilty although she had a bad adviser (she claims).

Think that's it.
 
oh dear, is this going to be another case of you saying I said one thing only to find I didn't.

You mean like when you said you didn't write £5k :LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL:

noseall said he worked Monday to Friday. You interpreted that to mean he works three days a week.

You seem to struggle hugely with basic law, basic English and basic arithmetic. How you ever came to earn close to half a million a year is totally beyond me.
 
Once again the morons can't understand basic English.
It’s likely that neither sets of lawyers were negligent and Ange was not dishonest. She’s taken further specialist advice, and paid up. End of story
 
You mean like when you said you didn't write £5k :LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL:

noseall said he worked Monday to Friday. You interpreted that to mean he works three days a week.

You seem to struggle hugely with basic law, basic English and basic arithmetic. How you ever came to earn close to half a million a year is totally beyond me.IWhere
Where did he say that?
 
You mean like when you said you didn't write £5k :LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL:
You were given the quote that said 2-5k - no need to lie, just because you were wrong.
noseall said he worked Monday to Friday. You interpreted that to mean he works three days a week.
which thread? I recall him saying he finished at 3 and didn't work a full week.
You seem to struggle hugely with basic law, basic English and basic arithmetic.
Nobody believes you have any legal knowledge other than that provided by google AI.
How you ever came to earn close to half a million a year is totally beyond me.
Your sums were wrong, if you go back and check them you will see that a person making roughly £1/3rd of a mil a year pays a round 44% tax & NI.

I'm happy to provide redacted tax returns, but you'll just claim I am boasting.
 
Where did he say that?

So the thread title is really, how can we make people who earn more than us, pay more taxes to fund the things we don't want to pay for.

I prefer to relook at what we intend to spend the money on and address the issue of people who do not reach their earning potential. Just the other day we had a Builder discussing his income of around £60k working 3 short days a week. With a tax contribution of less than 12k. If he could be encouraged to work full time, his contribution would almost triple. There are many more of him than their are of those in the 0.5% income bracket.

Of course it's easy to pretend the country can lock in the top 0,1% of earners and squeeze them harder. The reality is you can't, they are highly mobile and it ends up being the top 10% who pay. Those who already pay 68% of the income tax.
 
Where did he say that?

So the thread title is really, how can we make people who earn more than us, pay more taxes to fund the things we don't want to pay for.

I prefer to relook at what we intend to spend the money on and address the issue of people who do not reach their earning potential. Just the other day we had a Builder discussing his income of around £60k working 3 short days a week. With a tax contribution of less than 12k. If he could be encouraged to work full time, his contribution would almost triple. There are many more of him than their are of those in the 0.5% income bracket.

Of course it's easy to pretend the country can lock in the top 0,1% of earners and squeeze them harder. The reality is you can't, they are highly mobile and it ends up being the top 10% who pay. Those who already pay 68% of the income tax.

@MNW67 needs to quote from the self employed vs employed thread rather than a different thread, its like he does it dishonestly.​

 
You are

You have repeatedly stated she engaged in tax evasion and is a tax dodger.....that is suggesting her position was fraudulent.

He is extremely slippery with language. It seems to be a compulsion.
 
Back
Top