I tell you again:Oh well - one more thing you believe which is not supported by any evidence.
If you want an enquiry, you must think that white people are also involved in CSE, or at least likely enough to make it worth enquiring into.
And yet if someone says that white people are also involved in CSE you spew out an appalling insult like this:
So which is true?
That you do want an enquiry into CSE carried out by white people?
Or that anybody who says that white people are also involved in CSE is supporting rape gangs?
THEY CANNOT BOTH BE TRUE.
And yet when someone points out to you that "all child abusers" includes "white child abusers" you accuse them of trying to support rape gangs by saying that there are other rape cases involving white people.
So which is true?
That there should be dedicated departments of police hunting down ALL child abusers and rapists?
Or that anybody who says that white people are also child abusers and rapists is supporting rape gangs?
THEY CANNOT BOTH BE TRUE.
So far, your beloved child rapist gang members have been found to be Asian/Pakistani.
White rapists exist, but so far they have been found to be lone wolves, not organised in gangs.
That's the difference!
The gang members have a logistic plan in place to systematically groom and rape children. They believe it is ok to do this.
The others are dirty bast@rds who act on their animals instinct. They know they're criminals and they don't discuss their crimes with anyone, that's why they're not in gangs
If the enquiry finds white rapists gangs I'll withdraw this statement, but in the meantime this is the pure truth.
