• Looking for a smarter way to manage your heating this winter? We’ve been testing the new Aqara Radiator Thermostat W600 to see how quiet, accurate and easy it is to use around the home. Click here read our review.

What's the monarchy for?

Joined
11 Nov 2020
Messages
16,075
Reaction score
2,472
Location
Middle Earth
Country
United Kingdom
David Dimbleby asks the question on the Beeb in an interesting delve into the evolving relationship of the royals in modern Britain.
Due deference was paid towards Qeen Elizabeth II but when King Charles passes the torch on the King Bill IV i wonder how much influence he can wield in a changing world.
 
Seems to be an unjustifiable case of the ultimate nepotism.

I’d prefer a democratic process for choosing the head of state and for them to be subject to the same tax rules as the rest of us. Though he’d probably move to Dubai like so many other wealthy tax payers.
 
It symbolizes the old Empire and our quaint class structure. But the economic power of the aristocracy no longer exists. Amazon is the new God.
The press want to control the monarchy, not destroy it, but the institution as we know it changed forever after Her Majesty passed.
It retains some influence through the soft power of pomp and ceremony, and draws in tourists. Maybe the state visit got us a few per cent off the tariffs.
You wouldn’t invent it if you were writing a new Constitution, but it is a part of what makes us feel British. The King is more “British” than Far age imo, .
 
the monarchy maintains the elitist class system.

although I see it as a least worst option compared to a presidential system
 
America has a presidential system where the president is head of state and head of government -and when you voted in a complete fek-wit the country get destroyed in under a year
 
What's the monarchy for? If they weren't around, someone would have to come up with an idea for an image to put on stamps and money after the Government put the job out to tender and knowing our Governments, present and past, this will cost a small fortune, and go to one of their chums. That is the point of them, so they can stick the Monarch's boat on it.
 
Source? That's the sort of thing that can be fudged quite easily.

And spend is different to 'cost'.
If I say FACT in capitals I dont need a source.....

Good enough for me.

Screenshot_20251203_181634_Chrome.jpg
 
The monarchy still have a relevant, important, role to play in the modern world, to my way of thinking. It's impossible to imagine our country without them. An unbroken thread going back over a thousand years linking us with our ancestors and maintaining continuity with the ever changing landscape. It's not a monarchy, such as the Netherlands or Denmark; it's the monarchy: a globally recognised brand representing our nation in ways other countries respect. They maintain great houses and estates containing the nations art treasures; they provide diplomatic ties with important trading partners - look how eagerly Trump accepted the offer of another state visit, and softened his stance on tariffs as a result.

King Charles has the common touch; able to talk equably with presidents and people on the street with an ease born of long experience and his son, William, inherits that ability to do so with the backing of a large proportion of the population and the blessing of a long established Christian tradition which have come to define a kingdom united through blood and fire. Without them how long would the United Kingdom remain intact?
 
Back
Top