ICE told to get the eff out

  • Thread starter Thread starter JP_
  • Start date Start date
Exactly. Nail on the head, I haven't a clue with US law in the least, all I am doing is applying a bit of common sense to the case with a few legal bits I have read thrown in.

I am happy that I understand the law concerning all the parts we have discussed over the past few days. Although it is a complex situation, the law itself isn't that difficult, if you are able to break it all down and look at it all objectively. But I am also totally relaxed about admitting the bits I don't know. The final bit we started discussing last night was the issue of whether Becca Good might be guilty of a crime for shouting at Renee to drive. And that is where it gets much more complicated. The laws on areas such as encouraging someone to commit a crime and joint enterprise take it to a whole new level of complexity.
 
...behind the scenes, current and former ICE agents have expressed concerns about the agent’s conduct, about the agency’s operations in Minneapolis, and about a broader push by the Trump administration to aggressively recruit more agents. “I’m embarrassed,” one former ICE agent with more than 25 years of experience told TIME. “The majority of my colleagues feel the same way. It’s an insult to us, because we did it the right way to see what they’re doing now.”
 
I wonder if as a general rule we can agree to post the question asked, with the AI response? It’s so easy get confirmation bias with a question and poor quality sources. That way, anyone can test the sources independently.

As I’ve already said, the issue facing Becca Good is one of joint enterprise, “impeding a federal officer”, but they could stretch this to some sort of reckless endangerment. Personally I think it will go nowhere and is a way to focus blame on her and remind observers they were not innocent observers attacked without cause.
 
Trolling time for odds.
Personally I think it will go nowhere and is a way to focus blame on her and remind observers they were not innocent observers attacked without cause.

The Constitution protects the right to protest in the First Amendment guaranteeing freedom of speech, peaceful assembly, and the right to petition the government for grievances, allowing public expression of views...

 
They weren't...MNW has been through all that
He shared an opinion. Others disagree.

There isn’t much point in posting video of an angry anti ICE person talking to another anti ICE persons.

None of it makes any difference to the lawfulness of the shooting.
 
"60 Minutes” on Sunday aired its story about Trump administration deportations that was abruptly pulled from the newsmagazine’s lineup a month ago, a move that had triggered an internal battle about political pressure that spilled out into the open.

“Since November, ‘60 Minutes’ has made several attempts to interview key Trump administration officials on camera about our story,” Alfonsi said. “They declined our requests.”
 
He shared an opinion. Others disagree.

There isn’t much point in posting video of an angry anti ICE person talking to another anti ICE persons.

None of it makes any difference to the lawfulness of the shooting.
Feel free to ignore what other ICE agents are saying about the incident. #1969
 
Back
Top