ICE told to get the eff out

  • Thread starter Thread starter JP_
  • Start date Start date
DHS officials say their agents feared for their lives as Pretti was legally carrying a gun.
If that's the case and then they allegedly took the gun, then why did they execute him for acting lawfully?

Ironically the US gun laws are meant to protect against any government, foreign or domestic, who threaten a 'free state'...

The fact that the gun laws are imo stupid, what we have here is an armed militia (ICE) behaving like a banana republic rabble and killing their own citizens at will...

Supported by a corrupt and dangerous regime !
 
Last edited:
Fantastic video, thanks. It was an execution pure and simple. The man interviewed is the top legal advocate in Minnesota for those defending their gun right. He explains it step by step.

The gun wasn't visible.
The victim never tries to touch his gun.
The agents disable him by forcing him onto his knees and pinning his arms.
They remove his gun.
And then they execute him.
Yes they tend to do that to mass killers with a firearm.
 
Fantastic video, thanks. It was an execution pure and simple. The man interviewed is the top legal advocate in Minnesota for those defending their gun right. He explains it step by step.

The gun wasn't visible.
The victim never tries to touch his gun.
The agents disable him by forcing him onto his knees and pinning his arms.
They remove his gun.
And then they execute him.
We've all seen the footage and only a total Dork would try to make this a legal shooting in self defence.
 
Don't forget who suggested that ;)
So you may want to live in a lawless society and have everyone walking around with guns threatening people including law enforcement officers, I don't want that, I prefer to live within the law where the law protects me.
 
This is madness; there is now going to be another 150 pages of fake concern over a person whom of none of you know, in an event that none of you were involved in.

I wish this man hadn't been shot, same as I wish the Goode woman hadn't, but the bigger picture is that America is trying to deal with what is effectively a foreign invasion. They are not going about it the right way - if they had followed step 2 of my plan these shootings of agitators would not have happened:

Step 2: Declare an emergency, all normal rules suspended, martial law etc in force. Any dissenters, immigration lawyers and campaigners, protesters, ugly women with blue hair and other left-wing types locked up for the duration.

The lifting of invaders from an urban area cannot be carried out whilst it is "business as usual" in said area.

Besides my plan, the only other way to keep the peace would be to publicly declare than anyone interfering with an ICE operation will be met with "lethal force". But that would not be my preference.
 
This is madness; there is now going to be another 150 pages of fake concern over a person whom of none of you know, in an event that none of you were involved in.

I wish this man hadn't been shot, same as I wish the Goode woman hadn't, but the bigger picture is that America is trying to deal with what is effectively a foreign invasion. They are not going about it the right way - if they had followed step 2 of my plan these shootings of agitators would not have happened:

Step 2: Declare an emergency, all normal rules suspended, martial law etc in force. Any dissenters, immigration lawyers and campaigners, protesters, ugly women with blue hair and other left-wing types locked up for the duration.

The lifting of invaders from an urban area cannot be carried out whilst it is "business as usual" in said area.

Besides my plan, the only other way to keep the peace would be to publicly declare than anyone interfering with an ICE operation will be met with "lethal force". But that would not be my preference.
Absolutely spot on
 
So you may want to live in a lawless society and have everyone walking around with guns threatening people including law enforcement officers, I don't want that, I prefer to live within the law where the law protects me.
By that logic everyone in the states who carries a firearm lawfully or protests lawfully is open to execution...

By an out of control militia with no care for the lives of even their own citizens

That's pathetic even by your standards...

Only a person who is at one with the orange rapist could argue directly against their own comments as you have done!
 
This is madness; there is now going to be another 150 pages of fake concern over a person whom of none of you know, in an event that none of you were involved in.

I wish this man hadn't been shot, same as I wish the Goode woman hadn't, but the bigger picture is that America is trying to deal with what is effectively a foreign invasion. They are not going about it the right way - if they had followed step 2 of my plan these shootings of agitators would not have happened:

Step 2: Declare an emergency, all normal rules suspended, martial law etc in force. Any dissenters, immigration lawyers and campaigners, protesters, ugly women with blue hair and other left-wing types locked up for the duration.

So, a Concentration Camp is your answer.


Figures.
 
If that's the case and then they allegedly took the gun, then why did they execute him for acting lawfully?

He must've called the agent a Fascist, so the agent shot him to prove he wasn't.

Who says Americans don't get irony?
 
By that logic everyone in the states who carries a firearm lawfully or protests lawfully is open to execution...

By an out of control militia with no care for the lives of even their own citizens

That's pathetic even by your standards...

Only a person who is at one with the orange rapist could argue directly against their own comments as you have done!
Twist and turn all you like, I am entitled to hold an opinion without ridicule, so if all you can do is insult rather than debate, you are trying it on with the wrong person.
 
Twist and turn all you like, I am entitled to hold an opinion without ridicule, so if all you can do is insult rather than debate, you are trying it on with the wrong person.
If pointing out facts you ignore is ridicule to you, then you must be very used to it...

But then you support state executions so you're coming at this from a very low point!
 
So, a Concentration Camp is your answer.


Figures.
The term "Concentration Camp" per se is quite harmless, it simply means to put everyone in one location. Obviously, it has other connotations, due to the Nazis. You are being very overtly and demonstrably dishonest in implying the Nazi meaning on me.

In WW2, America put many of its Japanese population in camps to stop them causing trouble and aiding the enemy. Britain did similar by putting foreigners and various other agitators in camps on the Isle of Man. These were called Internment Camps. The inmates in both cases were well cared and were released at the end of the war.
 
If pointing out facts you ignore is ridicule to you, then you must be very used to it...

But then you support state executions so you're coming at this from a very low point!
You are not in my league. I will leave it at that as I don't tend to get into debates with those that just insult.
 
Back
Top