- Joined
- 7 Nov 2023
- Messages
- 15,255
- Reaction score
- 9,070
- Country

Think this pretty much clears the situation up.

If that's the case and then they allegedly took the gun, then why did they execute him for acting lawfully?DHS officials say their agents feared for their lives as Pretti was legally carrying a gun.

Yes they tend to do that to mass killers with a firearm.Fantastic video, thanks. It was an execution pure and simple. The man interviewed is the top legal advocate in Minnesota for those defending their gun right. He explains it step by step.
The gun wasn't visible.
The victim never tries to touch his gun.
The agents disable him by forcing him onto his knees and pinning his arms.
They remove his gun.
And then they execute him.
We've all seen the footage and only a total Dork would try to make this a legal shooting in self defence.Fantastic video, thanks. It was an execution pure and simple. The man interviewed is the top legal advocate in Minnesota for those defending their gun right. He explains it step by step.
The gun wasn't visible.
The victim never tries to touch his gun.
The agents disable him by forcing him onto his knees and pinning his arms.
They remove his gun.
And then they execute him.
Don't forget who suggested thatWe've all seen the footage and only a total Dork would try to make this a legal shooting in self defence.

So you may want to live in a lawless society and have everyone walking around with guns threatening people including law enforcement officers, I don't want that, I prefer to live within the law where the law protects me.Don't forget who suggested that![]()


Absolutely spot onThis is madness; there is now going to be another 150 pages of fake concern over a person whom of none of you know, in an event that none of you were involved in.
I wish this man hadn't been shot, same as I wish the Goode woman hadn't, but the bigger picture is that America is trying to deal with what is effectively a foreign invasion. They are not going about it the right way - if they had followed step 2 of my plan these shootings of agitators would not have happened:
Step 2: Declare an emergency, all normal rules suspended, martial law etc in force. Any dissenters, immigration lawyers and campaigners, protesters, ugly women with blue hair and other left-wing types locked up for the duration.
The lifting of invaders from an urban area cannot be carried out whilst it is "business as usual" in said area.
Besides my plan, the only other way to keep the peace would be to publicly declare than anyone interfering with an ICE operation will be met with "lethal force". But that would not be my preference.
By that logic everyone in the states who carries a firearm lawfully or protests lawfully is open to execution...So you may want to live in a lawless society and have everyone walking around with guns threatening people including law enforcement officers, I don't want that, I prefer to live within the law where the law protects me.
This is madness; there is now going to be another 150 pages of fake concern over a person whom of none of you know, in an event that none of you were involved in.
I wish this man hadn't been shot, same as I wish the Goode woman hadn't, but the bigger picture is that America is trying to deal with what is effectively a foreign invasion. They are not going about it the right way - if they had followed step 2 of my plan these shootings of agitators would not have happened:
Step 2: Declare an emergency, all normal rules suspended, martial law etc in force. Any dissenters, immigration lawyers and campaigners, protesters, ugly women with blue hair and other left-wing types locked up for the duration.
If that's the case and then they allegedly took the gun, then why did they execute him for acting lawfully?

Twist and turn all you like, I am entitled to hold an opinion without ridicule, so if all you can do is insult rather than debate, you are trying it on with the wrong person.By that logic everyone in the states who carries a firearm lawfully or protests lawfully is open to execution...
By an out of control militia with no care for the lives of even their own citizens
That's pathetic even by your standards...
Only a person who is at one with the orange rapist could argue directly against their own comments as you have done!
If pointing out facts you ignore is ridicule to you, then you must be very used to it...Twist and turn all you like, I am entitled to hold an opinion without ridicule, so if all you can do is insult rather than debate, you are trying it on with the wrong person.

The term "Concentration Camp" per se is quite harmless, it simply means to put everyone in one location. Obviously, it has other connotations, due to the Nazis. You are being very overtly and demonstrably dishonest in implying the Nazi meaning on me.So, a Concentration Camp is your answer.
Figures.

You are not in my league. I will leave it at that as I don't tend to get into debates with those that just insult.If pointing out facts you ignore is ridicule to you, then you must be very used to it...
But then you support state executions so you're coming at this from a very low point!