Trumps attack on Iran - 2026 edition

[noseall]

I would believe Trump

Untitled

• noseall
• 17 Jan 2015
• 3

Sucker.

 

[noseall]

I would believe Trump

Did you believe him days ago when his reason for chickening out last Saturday, was that Rubio, Witkoff, Kushner and Vance were negotiating with Iran?

Sucker.

 

[transam]

Show me what you think he said.

Show me what you think was stated on the BBC

I agree that you are probably some what dissapointed with any such statement as it does not fit your narrative

 

[JohnD]

I can't comment on what you think you heard.

Wadephul: "Wir wollen in Gespräche einbezogen werden"

Außenminister Johann Wadephul betont beim Außenministertreffen der G7 die enge deutsche Partnerschaft zu den Vereinigten Staaten - trotz der ständigen Eskapaden von Donald Trumps Regierung. Nach Kriegsende im Iran könnte sich die Bundeswehr deshalb an militärischen Absicherungen beteiligen.

www.n-tv.de

He says he'd like Germany (Europe?) to be included in any discussions.

Not that Iran and US have been in negotiations.

 

[blup]

when oil and gas prices are stupidly high, the tax revenue is also stupidly high, if we were still utilising the north sea in the way we should be, that extra gov income could subsidise our energy costs

And on top of all that, if things got seriously out of hand, major war or the likes, an act of parliament could force these oil companies to land the oil here. (not sure if we have any oil refineries left, but that is another disgrace)

I don’t have a problem moving more to renewable energy. It makes sense given what Trumpf gets up to. But I have little doubt that everyone from manufacturers suppliers salesman and fitters will be using products that make them a fast buck rather than being reliable and fit for purpose.

 

[transam]

Preparations are being made for direct talks between Iran and the US in Pakistan ( ?) according to the Germans (?)

Again just reported on the BBC 10 mins ago

 

[transam]

I can't comment on what you think you heard.

Wadephul: "Wir wollen in Gespräche einbezogen werden"

Außenminister Johann Wadephul betont beim Außenministertreffen der G7 die enge deutsche Partnerschaft zu den Vereinigten Staaten - trotz der ständigen Eskapaden von Donald Trumps Regierung. Nach Kriegsende im Iran könnte sich die Bundeswehr deshalb an militärischen Absicherungen beteiligen.

www.n-tv.de

He says he'd like Germany (Europe?) to be included in any discussions.

Not that Iran and US have been in negotiations.

Not what was reported on the BBC

Take it up with the BBC

 

[JohnD]

Not what was reported on the BBC

I can't comment on what you think you heard. It seems you can't show us anything to support your belief.

 

[fillyboy]

Not as ancient as Israel's invented claims of ownership of Palestine, Syria, Lebanon etc

Judea and Samaria wasn't it? you're not seriously denying that are you?. really?

 

[transam]

I can't comment on what you think you heard. It seems you can't show us anything to support your belief.

Don’t care what you believe

Your never right about any thing ever

Agreed any such news is dissapointing to you

 

[DP]

The IRGC head of the navy has been taken out in a targeted strike.

Mossad have infiltrated food suppliers to the IRGC and a large number (?) of IRGC members have been killed by 'exploding tins of food'.

Due to a lack of troops, the IRGC are recruiting troops and will now accept anyone over the age of 12.

Lot of stuff on youtube is AI generated, someone’s idea or thought, political leaning too. There is no true reference like the proverbial yardstick- anything else lacks true facts

 

[noseall]

Preparations

Plausible.

Trumps excuse for chickening out last week however, does not hold water. Rubio Witkoff Vance and
Kushner, in talks with Iran, lol.

However, the latter of that mob would always have his begging bowl handy, whenever a free flight to the Middle East becomes available.

 

[blup]

You are so gullible like a lot of people to actually think than Iran are telling the truth!!!!

What motive would Irann have for lying about having talks? Fear of backlash from Irannian public opinion lol? There are probably talks about talks via Pakkistan. But those are not the advanced negotiations that Trumpf implies.

 

[JohnD]

Preparations

Not what you said earlier.

Thank you for agreeing with me.

 

[transam]

What motive would Irann have for lying about having talks? Fear of backlash from Irannian public opinion lol? There are probably talks about talks via Pakkistan. But those are not the advanced negotiations that Trumpf implies.

If you were an Iranian official you would be watching your back

And not just worrying about being bumped off by Israelis

Put what ever slant you like on it

Talks ?
Negotiations ?
Third party involvement ?

Call it what you will

I agree it’s some what dissapointing to you any as it does not fit yer narrative