Zionism Condemned

[fillyboy]

The trump effect - spreading the joy worldwide.

His perfidy has no limits.

The destruction of its foreign aid programmes and budgets in 2025 represented three quarters of the global decline. But the cuts are across the board: 26 of 34 OECD members shrank their budgets, including the five largest providers – France, Germany, Japan, the United Kingdom …

 

[fillyboy]

Since the start of Israel’s war with Hamas on October 7, 2023, the United States has enacted legislation providing at least $16.3 billion in direct military aid to Israel. An ongoing cost to the American taxpayer to the tune of $300bn since the foundation of the Zionist state.

Money well spent imco.

 

[Odds]

The destruction of its foreign aid programmes and budgets in 2025 represented three quarters of the global decline. But the cuts are across the board: 26 of 34 OECD members shrank their budgets, including the five largest providers – France, Germany, Japan, the United Kingdom …

Like i said, The trump effect.

 

[King Billy]

The destruction of its foreign aid programmes and budgets in 2025 represented three quarters of the global decline. But the cuts are across the board: 26 of 34 OECD members shrank their budgets, including the five largest providers – France, Germany, Japan, the United Kingdom …

The USA continued and concentrated its aid to Israel in one specific sector: military aid.

Weapons now being used to commit ethnic cleansing, genocide and other war crimes, in Gaza, the West Bank ,and Lebanon.

 

[King Billy]

Money well spent imco.

You support genocide, ethnic cleansing and other war crimes.
I suggest you reconsider your opinion.

 

[noseall]

You support genocide, ethnic cleansing and other war crimes.
I suggest you reconsider your opinion.

He loves it when Muslims are being slaughtered.
Moans like beehatch when they are displaced and end up in Europe though. Probably a Brexer too.
We need a better word for stoopid. It will come as no surprise - he’s a Trump HSer too.

 

[fillyboy]

You support genocide, ethnic cleansing and other war crimes.
I suggest you reconsider your opinion.

Self defence isn't a war crime.

 

[Odds]

Self defence isn't a war crime.

Not all Jews live in Israel, not all Israelis are Jewish, and not all Jews are Zionists.

 

[King Billy]

Self defence isn't a war crime.

It is when it's indiscriminate killing, not proportional, targeting medical workers and reporters, collective punishment, ethnic cleansing, torture, parading the prisoners, subjecting them to inhumane treatment, etc.

 

[fillyboy]

It is when it's indiscriminate killing, not proportional, targeting medical workers and reporters, collective punishment, ethnic cleansing, torture, parading the prisoners, subjecting them to inhumane treatment, etc.

Self defence is not a warcrime.

 

[noseall]

a warcrime.

Correct

 

[noseall]

Money well spent imco.

I bet you love it when they target 'terrorists' like these...

 

[fillyboy]

I bet you love it when they target 'terrorists' like these...

View attachment 416354

Reported.

 

[Highway Man]

I bet you love it when they target 'terrorists' like these...

View attachment 416354

Reported

 

[King Billy]

Self defence is not a warcrime.

Filly demonstrates his ignorance, not once, but he's content to repeat his display of ignorance.
I wonder if he's daft enough to do it a third time?

Limitations: State self-defence must strictly adhere to the principles of necessity and proportionality (the response must be limited to what is required to repel the attack). The use of force becomes illegal if it exceeds what is necessary to stop the threat

While a lawful act of self-defence is completely legal, acts committed under the guise of self-defence—such as deliberately targeting civilians, using disproportionate force that causes excessive collateral damage, or committing torture—remain prosecutable as war crimes.

In 2006 Michael Byers (he Canada Research Chair in Global Politics and International Law at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver.)
wrote:

"The IDF had bombed Beirut’s international airport, destroyed roads, bridges, power stations and petrol stations, and imposed an air and sea blockade. The Israeli army chief of staff, General Dan Halutz, had promised to ‘turn back the clock in Lebanon by twenty years’. All this in response, ostensibly, to the capture of two Israeli soldiers and the killing of eight others by Hezbollah militants on 12 July.
https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v28/n16/michael-byers/war-crimes
The right of self-defence identified by Blair and Bush is part of international law. Which makes two conclusions possible: either this area of international law is so elastic as to be inoperative; or it is being interpreted by Blair and Bush in an untenable way."

Clearly it's not inoperative, as shown by Noseall's presentation of the Netanyahu warrant for war crimes.

Michael Byers continues by discussing the difference between jus ad bellum and jus in bellum.

There are two sets of rules in play: the jus ad bellum, governing the recourse to force; and the jus in bello, also known as ‘international humanitarian law’, limiting the way belligerents may behave once a conflict has begun.

Even in domestic law you can only use a legal reason to negate a criminal act, if the conduct of that action is considered proportionate and necessary.
The Israeli War Crime suspects are not prepared to put their case before the ICC.

Filly relies on jus ad bello, and ignores the rules of engagement, i.e. jus in bello.
He needs to update his knowledge, or alternatively he can continue to demonstrate his ignorance and obvious bigotry.