There are some sick people in this country.

Did you read your presentation? :rolleyes:
The failings were not the policy, the failings were in the implemenation of the policy, probably caused by insufficient funding.
Doesn’t matter who is responsible for the failure, care in the community is a failure and not the 'success' you claim it to be.
 
Doesn’t matter who is responsible for the failure, care in the community is a failure and not the 'success' you claim it to be.
Absolutely it is a failing. Some serious mentally ill patients were kicked onto the streets and into our community when the assylum system financial crash came.
 
Yep, chalk another one up to the tories!
We’ve just had a three year old thrown into a crocodile pit by a care in the community nutter and as far as I’m aware, the Tories aren’t in power any more.

* Had any posts deleted lately, Mr rule breaker? :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:
 
We’ve just had a three year old thrown into a crocodile pit by a care in the community nutter and as far as I’m aware, the Tories aren’t in power any more.
Strangely enough the tories ran down the care in the community program by almost 30%...

Labour has started to increase the number of mental health professionals...

But then I guess your aged memory is failing you and you don't recall those 14 years of austerity ;)
 
It may or may not have been factor. We don't know. And we shouldn't speculate about what we don't know.
Who's speculating? Mental illness would be a less blameworthy explanation than some alternatives
But they need stimuli otherwise they will become even more ill. And there will be no chance of recovery.
Yes, but that doesn't alter the fact that they should be taken out of circulation if they're a danger to themselves or others.
Was that another case of inadequate funding caring for the mentally ill?
Is that supposed to be an answer to my question?

Haven't you anything better to do than keep posting, disagreeing on principle with anything anybody else says?
 
Doesn’t matter who is responsible for the failure, care in the community is a failure and not the 'success' you claim it to be.
a) I didn't claim it to be anything other than cheaper and more effective at treating mental illness. It's all relative, relative to institutionalising the patients.There isn't an absolute measure of anything in mental health, neither a failure, nor a success, just better, cheaper, more effective etc or not than...........
b) if you read your presented quote, you'll see that the criticisms were in the implementations of the policy, not the policy per se.


1781969951927.png


1781970084428.png


1781970177782.png


1781970270076.png
 
Labour has started to increase the number of mental health professionals...
Really? What sort of quality of so-called professionals would you be talking about? I mean, what happened to the two 'professionals' that were accompanying this one person in the zoo? Two to one care and they couldn’t look after him. Professionals? Don’t make me laugh. Minimum pay, minimum effort.
 
Really? What sort of quality of so-called professionals would you be talking about? I mean, what happened to the two 'professionals' that were accompanying this one person in the zoo? Two to one care and they couldn’t look after him. Professionals? Don’t make me laugh. Minimum pay, minimum effort.
You're speculating.
Is that because you can't accept that funding cuts have resulted in an underperforming delivery? :rolleyes:
I've just presented the findings, listing multiple failures of the Colocane case.
Here's the findings of the Christopher Clunis case, more serious failings of the patient not turning up for appointments, not taking his medication, and the NHS 'lost him', his doctor sacked him from her list for being aggressive, , etc.....
Let's wait for the findings in this recent case before we judge people, eh?
 
Back
Top