You do, Rule 1, is it? You're bloody unpleasant to have around. And it really seems to be a role you enjoy.
Deliberately posting offensive /provocative/off topic/needlessly critical/annoying/pointless/undesirable comments. There's a word for that.

Engines in full reverse, I see.
Engines in full reverse, I see.
The real question is does the analysis of pre-brexit and post-brexit growth take account of non-brexit problems? Using Germany as an example, it is clear that the claimed 6-8% Brexit reduction effect is nothing more than a simple analysis of the trend line. i.e. it was going like this, now its going like that.
Meanwhile the UK has moved up in global rankings
Europe's biggest economies have slowed sharply compared with their pre-2016 trends, and each has its own distinct drag — Germany's energy shock and industrial exposure, France's fiscal and pension strains, the UK's investment weakness and trade friction with the EU. That shared slowdown is a big part of why economists disagree on how much of Britain's specific underperformance is attributable to Brexit versus common European or global headwinds.

Yes of course. However it is pointless as a lefty can never accept an insult as just that because it is normal language to them along with trying to spread fear, doom and gloom whilst telling us we are RWR or gammons.You can point out this insult?

Oooh Mrs.Even when people DO get stuff wrong, you can usually see where they're coming from. There's no point pedantically correcting them.
But it's "difficulties"....![]()
Yes of course. However it is pointless as a lefty can never accept an insult as just that because it is normal language to them along with trying to spread fear, doom and gloom whilst telling us we are RWR or gammons.

You do, Rule 1, is it?
You're bloody unpleasant to have around.
.
.
What a load of twaddle! Verbal diarrhoea with brain disconnected.
.
.
your self-obsessed trolling.
.
.
what you do is post crap.
.
.
one of your your silly rants about how yellow is undeniably a fresher colour so their opinion was wrong.
.
.
That's because you're a self-important troll.
.
.
Get lost!

I have no clue what this means.And yet you haven't pointed it out.

Ah, you don't like a taste of your own medicine.
Insults are sometimes necessary.but not insult them in doing so surely?

Why?Insults are sometimes necessary.

Why?
You are a complete and utter idiot.
fruitcakes like yourself.
Idiot
idiot
Idiot.
OMG how can you be so stupid with just one head?
Stop being stupid.
Shut up stupid.
Are you stupid or something?
You are very stupid

As Wary4life said, Insults are sometimes necessary. I agree. However I don't believe mine are that bad and most of those you are quoting above is my replying to @pete01 rather than an insult as such. You just thought perhaps it clever to cut away most of the sentence and paste in a word from that sentence, at least one of those will have been directed towards you surely? If not add another to the listYou tell us.
Engines in full reverse, I see.
The real question is does the analysis of pre-brexit and post-brexit growth take account of non-brexit problems? Using Germany as an example, it is clear that the claimed 6-8% Brexit reduction effect is nothing more than a simple analysis of the trend line. i.e. it was going like this, now its going like that.
Meanwhile the UK has moved up in global rankings
Europe's biggest economies have slowed sharply compared with their pre-2016 trends, and each has its own distinct drag — Germany's energy shock and industrial exposure, France's fiscal and pension strains, the UK's investment weakness and trade friction with the EU. That shared slowdown is a big part of why economists disagree on how much of Britain's specific underperformance is attributable to Brexit versus common European or global headwinds.