- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 28,213
- Reaction score
- 7,232
- Country

Why do they need to come to the UK?

They obviously don't or they would have never reached Here !!!What if they need a visa? Or don't have a passport?
They get here without ID and Without Passports and they Transit numerous Countries and they certainly wouldn't need a Visa in every single one of the Countries they cross.So how and where does somebody without a passport, and who needs a visa to enter the UK, claim asylum here in a way which does not contravene the Immigration Act 1971?
You seem to be Oblivious to the Facts of WHY !!You seem to be labouring under the mistaken belief that people should only claim asylum here if they "need" to.

They obviously don't or they would have never reached Here !!!

BuT ThEy aRe nOt cLaImInG AsYlUm iN AnY Of tHoSe cOuNtRiEs. tHeY DoN'T HaVe tO.They get here without ID and Without Passports and they Transit numerous Countries and they certainly wouldn't need a Visa in every single one of the Countries they cross.
Absolute Rubbish, I have driven across most Countries in Europe and only every Once been stopped and asked for my Passport..................except for when re-entering Britain !!You've obviously never travelled or crossed any borders.
Your visa and passport is checked by the carrier.
If you don't have the correct travel documents they would refuse to allow you to board.
The reason for this is that if the traveller is refused permission to enter the uK, the carrier is responsible to take you back to your point of departure, at their cost.
Do yOu haVE thE InTElIgEncE To EvEn tHiNk WhY ????BuT ThEy aRe nOt cLaImInG AsYlUm iN AnY Of tHoSe cOuNtRiEs. tHeY DoN'T HaVe tO.
ThEy aRe cRoSsInG ThEm tO GeT HeRe wHeRe tHeY WaNt tO ClAiM AsYlUm. sOmEtHiNg tHeY ArE AlLoWeD To dO.
Clearly they Don't otherwise they wouldn't have Reached Here.........And who the Feck is Tommy Norris and what does he have to do with anything ?Clearly they dO, and clearly they havE.
And clearly yoU think you can change reality by wishing. Tommy Norris had something pithy to say about that.

Do yOu haVE thE InTElIgEncE To EvEn tHiNk WhY ????

Clearly they Don't otherwise they wouldn't have Reached Here
.........And who the Feck is Tommy Norris and what does he have to do with anything ?
Why Don't They Stay in the First Safe Country ??? That isn't Stating they Have To Stay in the First Safe Country. They Cross Numerous Countries Several of them are Muslim Countries and yet they Continue across all the Other Countries to Reach Here. SO WHY ??? Or does that Question Never Enter Your Tiny Mind. It's a bit like how you Cannot Take on Board that Most of The so called "Palestinians" Lived in Egypt and Syria, also they are ARABS and Arabs (this bit will blow your mind) Originate from ARABIA........Now who would have ever Know That !!! Yes, The Jews Did Colonise the Land that is Now Israel...... But, there are 53 Majority Muslim Countries in the World of which 16 are in the Middle East and Every Single One of Those Countries were Conquered and Colonised By ISLAM, so Israel actually Re Established a Jewish Nation In The Holy Land where they Originated from, Centuries before the Arab Muslims Even Existed.![]()
Why don't refugees stay in the first country they reach? | The IRC
Do refugees have to seek asylum in the first country they enter? Why don't asylum seekers stop before they get to the UK? It’s time to separate the myths from the facts…www.rescue.org
No, It's because the European Court of Human Rights Movement is and has been for many years Full of Woke Leftie Judges, Lawyers and Solicitors (for example Tony and Cherie Blair and Kier Starmer) who are more interested in the Rights of Criminals and who don't give a Jot for the Victims.Why they are allowed to?
Because the law is based on principles of humanity, not yours.
Why wouldn't they? The UK is as good a place as any. And we sprakken ze English.Why do they need to come to the UK?