they were your sources.
I know.
That's why i only read the headline.
As already pointed out by He-Who-Nose, you're trying to twist facts to suit your story.
they were your sources.
Not so smelly for the UK after all. Seems like we're in favour... "...the vast majority of Britons believe there should be a cap on political donations, a new poll has revealed....."No doubt if it is as smelly as you say, it deffo wont make it past the HoL.
The UK on donations.....Nigel on the donations...

Labour backdating the law - is unprecedented and it stinks
Hold your noses - it's what 'the people' want.This is the party that cancels elections where Reform is likely to win. It is also the party that has its critics arrested and jailed.

Do you think there should or should not be a limit on the amount of money individuals and entities can donate to a
political party?
Individual members donate very little. It's irrelevant how it is collected. Key word - individuals.based on that question - Labour are also screwed:
Labour : #1 Trade union £150M (41%)

Irrelevant waffle
And his workers would be individuals.Nosenout's Independent Traders would also be an entity.

So the entity is irrelevant?I have no clue - again.
Yes, in respect to the people choosing to contribute.So the entity is irrelevant?

Why not?why mention it in the poll then?
Bravo, you can read. And then you started waffling about entities."individuals and entities"
Or perhaps I'm just educating you to the fact that union members contribute to the Labour party as INDIVIDUALS.or are you just talking boll@x
Have you seen it?the poll