- Joined
- 7 Nov 2023
- Messages
- 14,995
- Reaction score
- 8,893
- Country

She wasn't shot in her faceShooting her in the face was ridiculous.

She wasn't shot in her faceShooting her in the face was ridiculous.
Rightly so. I would have been more shocked if no charges were brought to her doorstep.

Protest is one thing, but alerting criminals of law enforcement presence is entirely different. I couldn't believe they were actually allowed to do it.I have wondered the same thing. But it might come up against the First Amendment, from which stems the right to protest. It's tricky.
Of course they should.Her wife is being investigated for obstruction. I think under the circumstances they should let that slide.
I'm sure you are arguing against reality because you adore Trump.Rightly so. I would have been more shocked if no charges were brought to her doorstep.

No not at all but a bit obvious she would face charges.Of course they should.
I'm sure you are arguing against reality because you adore Trump.
Protest is one thing, but alerting criminals of law enforcement presence is entirely different. I couldn't believe they were actually allowed to do it.
What about the organisation that provide the whistles etc for the sole purpose of alerting criminals?
Shooting her in the head was ridiculous.She wasn't shot in her face

Not going around in circles, you have seen the video, she incited her wife into her actions.Well luckily, we have it all on video. How do you think Becca impeded the agent. As I've mentioned before, the worst thing she did was call him 'big boy' and tell him to go on his lunch break.

To you maybe. Not for the ICE agent who she ran overShooting her in the head was ridiculous.
Not going around in circles, you have seen the video, she incited her wife into her actions.
The investigation into Becca Good is focused on the first statute listed in Bondi’s memo, a section of the U.S. Code on “assaulting, resisting, or impeding federal officers,” the people said.
Renee good was just waiting in her car while her Mrs was recording things on her phone.Not going around in circles, you have seen the video, she incited her wife into her actions.

yes parked in the middle of the road lengthways on, sensible parking.Renee good was just waiting in her car while her Mrs was recording things on her phone.

Shame she didn’t do that.It is tricky. I had to Google. Again! Sorry.
AI Overview
Yes, the First Amendment generally protects the right of individuals to blow whistles, shout warnings, or record Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents in public
, as this is considered protected speech and assembly. However, this protection is not absolute and does not allow for physical obstruction of law enforcement,, such as blocking vehicles or preventing arrests.
Here are the legal boundaries regarding this activity based on recent reports:
In summary, blowing a whistle to alert people to a raid is generally a legal, protected activity, provided it is done from a safe distance and does not physically interfere with the agents' actions.
- Protected Activities: Making noise, blowing whistles, yelling to warn others of ICE presence, and filming agents in public spaces are protected by the First Amendment. These actions are considered "peaceful and unobstructive" protests.
- Illegal Activities (Obstruction): Protesters cannot physically interfere with, stop an arrest, block roadways, or cause harm to federal officers. Doing so can lead to charges of obstructing or impeding federal officers.
- Legal Risks: While generally protected, warning people about raids can still lead to arrest, and in some contexts, officials may attempt to argue such actions constitute "obstruction" or "harboring" if they go beyond simply spreading awareness and actively help someone evade detention.
- Context: The use of whistles and other signals has become a common form of protest by "ICE Watch" groups in cities like Chicago, Los Angeles, and Minneapolis to inform communities of raids.
Shame she didn’t do that.

Clearly see where she went wrong.Illegal Activities (Obstruction): Protesters cannot physically interfere with, stop an arrest, block roadways, or cause harm to federal officers. Doing so can lead to charges of obstructing or impeding federal officers.