ICE told to get the eff out

  • Thread starter Thread starter JP_
  • Start date Start date
Does she have a right to warn possible illegal immigrant to their operation?

This sort of thing?

David Loy, legal director of the nonprofit First Amendment Coalition, said that members of the public have the right to blow whistles or follow ICE vehicles at a sufficient distance and alert members of their community, but that protesters cannot physically stop an officer from doing his or her job.
 
How would a normal US citizen find out about a confidential immigration raid and then tip off the intended targets. I think it's a good question.

The thing is ICE would have greater success if they did it more discreetly or stealthily. Everyone knows this. The fat orange rapist is more interested in sowing chaos and is why he is now flooding Minneapolis with even more ICE agents.

I think chicken biker will go into hiding after his last question.
 
I think chicken biker will go into hiding after his last question.
You somehow think I’m supporting them. From the start, I’ve stated my view on the lawfulness of the action based on their laws. Of course I don’t support the idea of shooting people who flee police.

But that is not something the US court system seems to uphold.
 
Does she have a right to warn possible illegal immigrant to their operation?
That is one of the questions I was thinking about last week. I found it hard to believe that these so called 'observers' weren't committing an offence by alerting 'criminals' that law enforcement officers are in the area.
I suspected that such behaviour would be treated as some kind of aiding and abetting, but apparently not?
Perhaps it would be wise to amend the law around this?
 
That is one of the questions I was thinking about last week. I found it hard to believe that these so called 'observers' weren't committing an offence by alerting 'criminals' that law enforcement officers are in the area.
I suspected that such behaviour would be treated as some kind of aiding and abetting, but apparently not?
Perhaps it would be wise to amend the law around this?
I think this shooting might quieten them down a bit
 
That is one of the questions I was thinking about last week. I found it hard to believe that these so called 'observers' weren't committing an offence by alerting 'criminals' that law enforcement officers are in the area.
I suspected that such behaviour would be treated as some kind of aiding and abetting, but apparently not?
Perhaps it would be wise to amend the law around this?

I have wondered the same thing. But it might come up against the First Amendment, from which stems the right to protest. It's tricky.
 
Her wife is being investigated for obstruction. I think under the circumstances they should let that slide.
 
Back
Top