ICE told to get the eff out

SPLINE · 25 Jan 2026

This is madness; there is now going to be another 150 pages of fake concern over a person whom of none of you know, in an event that none of you were involved in.

I wish this man hadn't been shot, same as I wish the Goode woman hadn't, but the bigger picture is that America is trying to deal with what is effectively a foreign invasion. They are not going about it the right way - if they had followed step 2 of my plan these shootings of agitators would not have happened:

Step 2: Declare an emergency, all normal rules suspended, martial law etc in force. Any dissenters, immigration lawyers and campaigners, protesters, ugly women with blue hair and other left-wing types locked up for the duration.

The lifting of invaders from an urban area cannot be carried out whilst it is "business as usual" in said area.

Besides my plan, the only other way to keep the peace would be to publicly declare than anyone interfering with an ICE operation will be met with "lethal force". But that would not be my preference.

Highway Man · 25 Jan 2026

SPLINE said:
This is madness; there is now going to be another 150 pages of fake concern over a person whom of none of you know, in an event that none of you were involved in.

I wish this man hadn't been shot, same as I wish the Goode woman hadn't, but the bigger picture is that America is trying to deal with what is effectively a foreign invasion. They are not going about it the right way - if they had followed step 2 of my plan these shootings of agitators would not have happened:

Step 2: Declare an emergency, all normal rules suspended, martial law etc in force. Any dissenters, immigration lawyers and campaigners, protesters, ugly women with blue hair and other left-wing types locked up for the duration.

The lifting of invaders from an urban area cannot be carried out whilst it is "business as usual" in said area.

Besides my plan, the only other way to keep the peace would be to publicly declare than anyone interfering with an ICE operation will be met with "lethal force". But that would not be my preference.

Absolutely spot on

ellal · 25 Jan 2026

Highway Man said:
So you may want to live in a lawless society and have everyone walking around with guns threatening people including law enforcement officers, I don't want that, I prefer to live within the law where the law protects me.

By that logic everyone in the states who carries a firearm lawfully or protests lawfully is open to execution...

By an out of control militia with no care for the lives of even their own citizens

That's pathetic even by your standards...

Only a person who is at one with the orange rapist could argue directly against their own comments as you have done!

Odds · 25 Jan 2026

SPLINE said:
This is madness; there is now going to be another 150 pages of fake concern over a person whom of none of you know, in an event that none of you were involved in.

I wish this man hadn't been shot, same as I wish the Goode woman hadn't, but the bigger picture is that America is trying to deal with what is effectively a foreign invasion. They are not going about it the right way - if they had followed step 2 of my plan these shootings of agitators would not have happened:

Step 2: Declare an emergency, all normal rules suspended, martial law etc in force. Any dissenters, immigration lawyers and campaigners, protesters, ugly women with blue hair and other left-wing types locked up for the duration.

So, a Concentration Camp is your answer.

Figures.

Odds · 25 Jan 2026

ellal said:
If that's the case and then they allegedly took the gun, then why did they execute him for acting lawfully?

He must've called the agent a Fascist, so the agent shot him to prove he wasn't.

Who says Americans don't get irony?

Highway Man · 25 Jan 2026

ellal said:
By that logic everyone in the states who carries a firearm lawfully or protests lawfully is open to execution...

By an out of control militia with no care for the lives of even their own citizens

That's pathetic even by your standards...

Only a person who is at one with the orange rapist could argue directly against their own comments as you have done!

Twist and turn all you like, I am entitled to hold an opinion without ridicule, so if all you can do is insult rather than debate, you are trying it on with the wrong person.

ellal · 25 Jan 2026

Highway Man said:
Twist and turn all you like, I am entitled to hold an opinion without ridicule, so if all you can do is insult rather than debate, you are trying it on with the wrong person.

If pointing out facts you ignore is ridicule to you, then you must be very used to it...

But then you support state executions so you're coming at this from a very low point!

SPLINE · 25 Jan 2026

Odds said:
So, a Concentration Camp is your answer.

Figures.

The term "Concentration Camp" per se is quite harmless, it simply means to put everyone in one location. Obviously, it has other connotations, due to the Nazis. You are being very overtly and demonstrably dishonest in implying the Nazi meaning on me.

In WW2, America put many of its Japanese population in camps to stop them causing trouble and aiding the enemy. Britain did similar by putting foreigners and various other agitators in camps on the Isle of Man. These were called Internment Camps. The inmates in both cases were well cared and were released at the end of the war.

Highway Man · 25 Jan 2026

ellal said:
If pointing out facts you ignore is ridicule to you, then you must be very used to it...

But then you support state executions so you're coming at this from a very low point!

You are not in my league. I will leave it at that as I don't tend to get into debates with those that just insult.

MNW67 · 25 Jan 2026

SPLINE said:
The term "Concentration Camp" per se is quite harmless, it simply means to put everyone in one location. Obviously, it has other connotations, due to the Nazis. You are being very overtly and demonstrably dishonest in implying the Nazi meaning on me.

In WW2, America put many of its Japanese population in camps to stop them causing trouble and aiding the enemy. Britain did similar by putting foreigners and various other agitators in camps on the Isle of Man. These were called Internment Camps. The inmates in both cases were well cared and were released at the end of the war.

As you say, the term concentration camp is a technical one. It was you who inferred the Nazi connotations.

SPLINE · 25 Jan 2026

MNW67 said:
As you say, the term concentration camp is a technical one. It was you who inferred the Nazi connotations.

No, it was Odds, you twister! See the post of his that I quoted from.

Highway Man · 25 Jan 2026

SPLINE said:
No, it was Odds, you twister! See the post of his that I quoted from.

He is burnt out, I think his AI assistant has gone faulty

MNW67 · 25 Jan 2026

SPLINE said:
No, it was Odds, you twister!

How can you people expect to be taken seriously when you lie so much?

I will be happy to admit if I am wrong. I might have missed the full post.

But as far as I can see, all Odds said was that they sounded like concentration camps.

And you turned around and claimed he was calling you a Nazi.

Where did Odds actually call you a Nazi, fascist etc.?

Highway Man · 25 Jan 2026

MNW67 said:
I will be happy to admit if I am wrong.

Fibber

MNW67 · 25 Jan 2026

Highway Man said:
Fibber

I am always happy to admit I am wrong. Other posters have sometimes made fun of me for doing it. I have never been interested in winning an argument. I just want to have a grown up discussion.

ICE told to get the eff out

Similar threads