- Joined
- 29 Dec 2025
- Messages
- 2,032
- Reaction score
- 106
- Country

Why?Reported

Why?Reported

Can fairy stories be incompatible, if they're fairy stories?So incompatible fairy stories.

Now you've confused him by giving him three options.Don't you want to hear it?
Here you said that a lot of people believe that some elements of the US religious right are antisemitic, and the AP article you read says the same, so why don't you want to hear that there's a fracture developing?
Is it because you don't think it is true, despite your post , or is it because you do think it's true but wish it wasn't?

Prove that you're not lying by providing some evidence.It’s the truth, you can’t handle it.

His post ws pure ad hominem.No he didn't. He said absolutely nothing about the content of the article.

A lot of filly's posts are.It was just a furious rant full of ad hominems.

That's possible. They just want anything they think is anti-Semitism to be deleted without question.It's the wrong sort of anti-Semitism as far as they are concerned.

But you reported it as being anti-Semitic?I haven't read the article and have no intention of doing so,
But maybe it goes like this:
- Odds posts a valid, non Jew-hating criticism of Israel, or Zionist land-grabbing settlers.
- You and other posters are so incensed by this that you and other posters bombard the mods with reports.
- The mods, with insufficient resources to investigate properly just delete the post.
- You and other posters then start saying "Odds must have posted antisemitism because look - it's been deleted".
For them it's a kind of self-fulfilling process:
Odds posts an article which they can't comprehend --> It must be anti-Semitic --> Odds posts another article that they can't understand --> in their eyes Odds is anti-Semitic --> every post he makes presenting an article is assumed to be anti-Semitic. --> they're convinced that Odds ia anti-Semitic.

Welcome to the ad hominems reunited club.I have stayed out of such discussions for a long time. I began to find them incredibly repetitive and tiresome. In this case, it is a shame that you are attacking me with ad hominens over an article you haven't even read which covers an extremely important issue.

Only if you're a believer.Christ is indeed King and as such the term should only be used to reflect that and to give praise to Jesus.

We are all right, you, MBK, filly, koolpc, et al are wrong.You’re right. We are all wrong.
Well done King Billy

Because his academic articles are usually deleted at he behest of MBK, fily, koolpc, Dec27, etc.23 pages, this has to be the most replies Odds has ever got from any of his threads and yet he has said very little in the way of participating to this thread himself.

He'll now claim it's been deleted.Go on then - prove it.

But you couldn't say why you reported it, nor what you found offensive in it, nor were you able to copy and paste an excerpt from it that you thought might be anti-Semitic.Has anyone actually admitted to not reading it “most”
I’ve read it

So to sum up:Good point.
I suppose only HWM and Fillyboy have actually admitted that they haven't read it.
MBK claims to have read it but seems to have no clue what is in it.
But you couldn't say why you reported it, nor what you found offensive in it, nor were you able to copy and paste an excerpt from it that you thought might be anti-Semitic.
And you completely misunderstood it because you reported it.