“Christ is king”

So incompatible fairy stories.
Can fairy stories be incompatible, if they're fairy stories?
They would have to go something like this:
Jack and Jill went up the hill........
Or
Jack and Jill didn't go up the hill.......

But as they're fairy stories, they might not be referring to the same Jack, or Jill, or the same hill, because everything in the fairy stories is fantasy.
 
Don't you want to hear it?

Here you said that a lot of people believe that some elements of the US religious right are antisemitic, and the AP article you read says the same, so why don't you want to hear that there's a fracture developing?

Is it because you don't think it is true, despite your post , or is it because you do think it's true but wish it wasn't?
Now you've confused him by giving him three options.
 
It's the wrong sort of anti-Semitism as far as they are concerned.
That's possible. They just want anything they think is anti-Semitism to be deleted without question.
But this was an academic paper about anti-Semitism, which they couldn't understand how anyone can discuss anti-Semitism without being anti-Semitic.
 
I haven't read the article and have no intention of doing so,
But you reported it as being anti-Semitic?
Why? Because Odds posted it? and you think Odds is anti-Semitic?
But maybe it goes like this:
  1. Odds posts a valid, non Jew-hating criticism of Israel, or Zionist land-grabbing settlers.
  2. You and other posters are so incensed by this that you and other posters bombard the mods with reports.
  3. The mods, with insufficient resources to investigate properly just delete the post.
  4. You and other posters then start saying "Odds must have posted antisemitism because look - it's been deleted".
For them it's a kind of self-fulfilling process:
Odds posts an article which they can't comprehend --> It must be anti-Semitic --> Odds posts another article that they can't understand --> in their eyes Odds is anti-Semitic --> every post he makes presenting an article is assumed to be anti-Semitic. --> they're convinced that Odds ia anti-Semitic.
 
I have stayed out of such discussions for a long time. I began to find them incredibly repetitive and tiresome. In this case, it is a shame that you are attacking me with ad hominens over an article you haven't even read which covers an extremely important issue.
Welcome to the ad hominems reunited club.
 
23 pages, this has to be the most replies Odds has ever got from any of his threads and yet he has said very little in the way of participating to this thread himself.
Because his academic articles are usually deleted at he behest of MBK, fily, koolpc, Dec27, etc.
So there is little time for anyone else to read them or to comment on them, unfortunately.
 
Has anyone actually admitted to not reading it “most”

I’ve read it
But you couldn't say why you reported it, nor what you found offensive in it, nor were you able to copy and paste an excerpt from it that you thought might be anti-Semitic.
And you completely misunderstood it because you reported it.
 
Good point.

I suppose only HWM and Fillyboy have actually admitted that they haven't read it.

MBK claims to have read it but seems to have no clue what is in it.
So to sum up:
Filly, HWM admit to not reading it, bu they reported it.
MBK claimed to have read it, but misunderstood it, and reported it
And Dec27 claimed to have read it, and reported it, but:-
But you couldn't say why you reported it, nor what you found offensive in it, nor were you able to copy and paste an excerpt from it that you thought might be anti-Semitic.
And you completely misunderstood it because you reported it.
 
Back
Top