Search results

  1. I

    UFOs

    Marvel can keep secrets. Disclosure day was a Universal Pictures production.
  2. I

    UFOs

    I've said what I think it is and you disagree, you haven't said what you think it is.
  3. I

    UFOs

    You said you don't think it is a seperation plume. What do you think it is. Don't just list possibilities, what do you think it most likely is.
  4. I

    UFOs

    I haven't found one that satisfies you but I'm not going to spend my life Google things for you. It looks enough like lens flare I've seen that I'm happy with it. Now, what is your theory, you're not just a troll that keeps demanding other people explain things and then refuse the same courtesy...
  5. I

    UFOs

    Nope, it's tedious. There are lots of little blue flares crawling over the eartha surface in that recording, but no image I post will ever convince you because you know the truth apparently. So tell me more about your theory of what we're seeing here. Is it Thor in his invisible sapphire...
  6. I

    UFOs

    They're all over this time lapse recording from the ISS. But demanding a lens flare that is 'exactly' like that is unreasonable. There aren't many searchable GoPro stills from low earth orbit just inside the atmosphere.
  7. I

    UFOs

    I mean, it's not like GoPro cameras are known to have blue lens flare issues. https://community.gopro.com/s/question/0D53b00008Bta7uCAB/blue-flare-problem-bleepty-stabilisation?language=en_US
  8. I

    UFOs

    Thor likes angular clouds. He thinks it makes them look like refraction lines.
  9. I

    UFOs

    What proof have you it is not Thor? God of thunder and blue space clouds?
  10. I

    Clacton

    It would massively boost tourism. But I'm not sure I agree with number 16.
  11. I

    Clacton

    I don't think you understand what that words means.
  12. I

    UFOs

    Of course it can appear that way. As a light source (clouds) move onto frame they reflect light and in this case cause a second source of lens flare.
  13. I

    Clacton

  14. I

    UFOs

    Hardly, because it's a lens flare, which you haven't even tried to disprove. It behaves exactly as you'd expect one to do so. And since your definition of what a UFO can do is 'anything' that gets you out of trying to explain anything that we see, you just shout magic and run off in a huff...
  15. I

    UFOs

    For everyone else in the thread: Geostationary orbit is when you are high enough above the earth and moving at just the right speed that your orbit keeps you over the same spot on the equator. It has to be 36,000 Km as any other height would mean that you would be orbiting faster or slower than...
  16. I

    UFOs

    That is not how it works.
  17. I

    UFOs

    Its pretty obvious if you think it through. That's even more stupid than plumes. Geostationary orbit is 36,000km above the earth. You've gone back to thousands rather than hundreds of Km after all and we're back to (invisible) objects the size of a moon. Its not the death star is it?
  18. I

    UFOs

    Of course not, it's lens flare. What do you think it is.
  19. I

    UFOs

    That would be the most stupid explanation possible. Even less likely than a blue glowing invisible UFO. You've got to be completely ignorant of orbital mechanics to think that would be loitering in frame.
  20. I

    UFOs

    He just asks questions. He has no opinions of his own.
Back
Top