Search results

So on what basis do you think we should decide which drugs should be illegal, and which not?

If you make dealing a criminal act then users inevitably become involved with criminal dealings, becoming participants in criminal transactions with the sort of people who might well have other products they wish to sell, and who will use the money they make to fund other criminal activities...

Of course I have the right to ask. I wasn't disputing the legal status of cannabis, but you said so it's quite in order for me to ask you in what way you need "protecting" from people who smoke cannabis?

Yeah - you're right. Nobody minds the people fighting. Nobody minds the people pssng in shop doorways and on public transport. Nobody minds the people throwing up on the streets, on public transport, in the backs of cabs, in their houses. Nobody minds drunken antics which result in property...

There's far more violence associated with alcohol than cannabis

The latter is not universally true.

In what way do you need "protecting" from people who smoke cannabis?

At the start of 1920 he was a Tory MP - had been since 1918. During that year he resigned the Conservative whip and became an independent. He retained his seat in the Commons, as an independent, in the 1922 and 1923 general elections. So he was a sitting MP when he switched again to join the...

I said 26-30 - I thought that he left the Labour Party in 1930, but that was when he resigned his ministerial position, he remained a Labour MP until early 1931. He joined a "Labour" party in 1924, but it was not the "Labour Party" which everyone means when they use that term - the one of...

Dunno. I tried to find out but lost the will to live due to more AI slop: The source for that is supposedly a Wikipedia page. Which says nothing of the sort, does not deal with that subject in any way, nor contain any of the text in the search result.

You seem to be overlooking the fact that when you zoom out on a satnav or other digital map application to see a larger area you lose detail. When you unfold a paper map to see a larger area you do not lose detail.

Maybe, maybe not - it would depend on how that person was manifesting their hallucinations. But given a choice between being sat on a bus or a train next to someone like that, and being sat on a bus or a train driven by somebody who'd recently swallowed a number of prescribed co-codamols....

(y) (y) (y)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LSD#Research

So?

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/jan/05/donald-trump-coup-venezuela-break-rules-regret https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/jan/04/the-guardian-view-on-the-us-seizure-of-maduro-trump-has-turned-the-worlds-superpower-into-a-rogue-state...

It's opioids which are killing Americans by the hundreds per day, not cocaine, and that problem was kickstarted by pharmaceutical companies, including American ones. Venezuela produces/transports cocaine, not opioids. And I think most of that goes to Europe. And if they cared about drugs...

But how can there possibly be more than one person who doesn't know how to spell the word? Incomprehensible that it could be a coincidence, surely?

The what3words system and app is free for anyone to use. The company states that its revenue comes from charging businesses that benefit from its products. So selling a satnav system which supported W3W would attract a licence fee.

Are they still there if you zoom out so your phone is showing a 10kmx5km area?