Search results

Two letters together combine to form a word. It's the semantic meaning of that word that holds little or great significance. For instance, "in" means not out, which can be very important, "on" meaning not off, can have a tremendous influence on subsequent actions. "If" holds a multitude of...

Ask Trump.

Or half a dozen diehard right wingers on social media.

The King is not obliged to follow the advice of the PM, he has other advisers he can consult. If a PM called an unpopular election (within his party), he/she is unlikely to withstand the party political fallout.

Starmer, or anyone else, would need the support of Parliament for an early GE. Starmer can assume he has the support of his party until such times as anyone challenges his leadership. A challenger would need the support of about 81 MPs, and 5% of the grassroots of the party, or some strong...

He doesn't need to do either regardless of the May local elections.

As ridiculous as Liz Trusses' 50 days? Did I miss something? Have I been in a time warp, or has Highway Man lost the last 6 years somewhere? Let's do the timewarp again.

Yes of course. I remember you calling for the same when May became PM. And didn't you say the same when Boris rose to be King of the world, and when truss inherited the title, and Sunak. I remember you arguing vehemently for General Elections during those troubled times. :D

They're not geographically limited. Or at least the ones that I've met weren't. ;)

All those hardworking immigrants claiming their hard-earned pensions after many years of working? Their pension should be forfeited. :rolleyes:

Abouy 90 or 14% of UK Parliament are of minority ethnic background. So it's a pretty good bet they're immigrants or descendants of immigrants. It's difficult to identify how immigrant caucasian MPs are or of immigrant descendancy, but I suspect a significantly high percentage, especially from...

Thanks for the breakdown. Is pension classed as a benefit?

Perhaps if they anglicised their name, they'd improve their chances of getting work:

Based on your figures, it's not surprising. There' still a heck of a lot of difference between the 9 million quoted and your 1.3 million. Which one is an exaggerated firgure, or are both of them exaggerations. And we need to define preciely what we mean by benefits.

You'll break it with questions like that.

As long as they're one of your chosen few, eh?

The vast majority of children killed by IDF were killed by bombs or tank fire. https://www.unicef.org/press-releases/two-years-hellish-war-have-devastated-gazas-children Why or how could a child have motivated such violence...

The opinion of the man who thinks the IDF is the most moral army in the world, but it is responsible for the highest percentage of children killed in any conflict in the last two decades.

Of course it is. :LOL:

How does he compare to Flipp-flopper-in-chief, TACO?