Search results

Britons uniting is the opposite of what you want though. Or are you just taking about race here?

.

Not really, Trump has never worried about that and as his dementia progresses it's even less of an issue for him. When there's no explicit objectives then it's easy to declare they've all been met. No matter what happens the plan will be rewritten to match.

There's no downside for him. He gets to act tough and has no personal risks.

There's a fair bit of unrest and stirrings, they are united in not wanting the US to get involved again. Iran still bears a grudge from when we and the US overthrew their democratically elected government for some reason.

Send in some incompetent burglars and knick it.

No, it didn't do much in the grand scheme of things. On the other hand no one believes Iran is actively working on nuclear arms at the moment. They're at a point where if they wanted to they could quickly put the materials together but they've been at that stage ever since Trump season 1 when...

With the concentration of US air and naval power around the Gulf there's an expectation that the US is going to attack Iran again. My bet is Trump is going to go for major airstrikes to prevent Iran getting a nuclear weapon! And to do so he'll target the head of the regime as well as general...

You mean British citizens? Legal immigrants have always shown up as a positive to the nations tax bills. Are you getting confused?

All the EPRs have been **** and doubled their budgets, the dangers of a new design, new kinks to work out. Also France has built one reactor this century, flamville C which is supposed to be a near clone of Hinckley, which took 17 years. We're not ****, nuclear power is ****. You need to be...

This is a good plan, let's do that.

It's amazing how the world's previous largest economy has recovered after the devastation of the British rule and being ripped apart during partition to become merely a large economy.

Slaves were 'employed'? I don't know what you're trying to signal but it stinks.

That's a bold theory, that by taking slaves rather than employing people the world was better off.

And? The windrush generation didn't sail on just one boat.

The main takeaway of this thread seems to be that the colonial elements of the British Empire in the Carribbean were utter *******s in all respects and that even if we aren't obligated to be ashamed of them we absolutely can't be proud of them or their contribution.

They absolutely were recruited by British companies. London transport alone recruited 6,000 Carribbean workers.

Don't feed the troll, he's going on about how the game was better 30 years before he was born.

Webb isn't exactly a trustworthy source. Anyone who subscribes to 'race science' should be the subject of a history book, not the author

More on a man famous for being smart, slippery and getting away with stuff, rather than a man famous for being thick and bailed out and sheiled by his powerful mummy?