I am doing this under a building control notice. I'm pretty sure that the door on the original bathroom was 30". The door to this room was an odd size (29" I think) but that needs bricking up now.
Thank god for that. I just fitted a 1050mm lintel.
Looking at https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/540330/BR_PDF_AD_M1_2015_with_2016_amendments_V3.pdf
page 17, I can't see a 686mm doorway. Does this only relate to new buildings or am I looking at the wrong...
I will be fitting a shower into a bathroom and want to embed the waste pipe into the floor. This will mean that the waste will exit the external wall either in the first or between the first and second blue courses. Is there anything wrong with this?
Thanks
So the BCO visited today and as expected he pulled up the wall width between the door opening and the window opening. In case someone finds it useful the minimum wall width should be the width of the window opening + the width of the door opening divided by 6. So for me this was...
I have created a new structural opening 900mm wide in a cavity wall. I have 2off 100x65x1200 lintels above 150mm bearing either side. There is only a brick width between the new opening and an existing window so I wanted to check if the BCO will pull it up.
Bco mentioned how heavy a stud wall is so I'm guessing he was thinking about load but also deflection if built on top of floorboards with a void underneath. Good idea to board on top of joists. Solves the problem of lots of ~300mm boards.
Even so, as a qualified plumber, he should have been able to find a suitable arrangement. Maybe your swan neck with a mcalpine WC-CON-EXT. Doesn't help your dilemma regarding payment though .
There are so many ways that this could have been done properly quite easily. The swan neck that someone suggested earlier is one way. You can buy flexi right angled pan connectors from Screwfix. At the very least he could have realigned the pipe with a MULTIKWIK MKO100 abeit not very nice...