Search results

Neither just Cert of lawful development under PD for side extension for my own.

The PA is granted because it doesn't effect amenity but that's not the question, its this "Although the scheme would not be permitted under Class A" according to gov guidance you can build a staggered extension off each rear wall so long as they dont overlap, so I don't see why its not permitted.

If the garage is part of the original house is permitted development rules for side extension from the red line or the green?

I am not concerned about other peoples application, as I said previous its for the purpose of research as is one of the reasons councils put this information in the public domain. The PA application is 21/00152/PRH I must have pasted the wrong one.

Yeah that's what I thought, so you think the officer is incorrect in this case that it's connected?

Right I thought the existing extension was the toilet area part starting from under the bay window. If the entire 2 story from that wall you highlighted is an extension then yes it will clearly be joined. But just for educational purposes if the current extension was from the bay window the...

No not anymore there is an additional extension its more to do with if the extensions join or not. Im just doing research because I am trying to learn and going through cases that have been recently declined, and I cant work out why this one is declined I want to know. The case is 20/03085/CEA...

Im pretty sure its original built with the house, there is no history of the existing extension being built. The officer even uses the word original "that the proposed extension would be joined with an original rear extension and when combined" im just not sure it seems to be treated as an...

But the extension being built is half or slightly less.. Also where can find how enlargements relates to original extension in the legislation?

Can someone help me understand this point, a prior approval has not been considered permitted development because its width would be more than half the width of the original house even though the width of the extension is not, only when they combine it with the width of the existing original...

Ok Thanks, so maybe PD rights have been removed.

I am thats why im asking, why did they fail a loft conversion under PD because it wasnt within 500mm all around....? https://new.enfield.gov.uk/services/planning/dmd-adopted-planning.pdf They refrenced this document DMD 13.

How can you ignore it though because the council have refused permission and stated dormer needs to be inset 500mm on all sides, the client obviously wants an approval from the council....

Can anyone advise on this. The council has a document on development which states critera that would prevent permitted development. Specifically this regarding lofts. Roof Extensions 1. Roof extensions to residential properties will only be permitted if all of the following criteria are met...