And another one..

MNW you are insulting your own, and everybody else's intelligence with a comment like that.

Eh? What is wrong with what I wrote?

I said that it is ridiculous that he gets compensation. But that the compensation was actually £7,500. And the rest was legal costs. Just clarifying the story for everyone because the headline is misleading.
 
And another one...

This is fecking ridiculous.
Ridiculous. But we should make clear that his award was £7,500, not £240,000. The rest was legal costs.
Doesn't matter, it's OUR money!
Or at least money belonging to people who pay taxes, do you?
 
Eh? What is wrong with what I wrote?

I said that it is ridiculous that he gets compensation. But that the compensation was actually £7,500. And the rest was legal costs. Just clarifying the story for everyone because the headline is misleading.

Again, that is just pointless pedantry. The whole sum of 240k was spent on him, and the whole sum of 240k was a loss to the taxpayer .
 
Doesn't matter, it's OUR money!
Or at least money belonging to people who pay taxes, do you?

Again, that is just pointless pedantry. The whole sum of 240k was spent on him, and the whole sum of 240k was a loss to the taxpayer .

OMG!!

Calm down guys. I have said twice that I think it is ridiculous. All I have done is clarify a misleading headline for those who haven't read the story. Stop wetting your knickers.
 
OMG!!

Calm down guys. I have said twice that I think it is ridiculous. All I have done is clarify a misleading headline for those who haven't read the story. Stop wetting your knickers.

Well, accept my apology if one is necessary. I was thinking of finding something you hadn't said, exaggerating it and then repeating it for another 10 pages, but I couldn't be bothered
 
The headline is deliberately misleading, with the intention of winding up the RWRs who provide the Mail's profits.

It is working. They are raging furiously.
 
The headline is deliberately misleading, with the intention of winding up the RWRs who provide the Mail's profits.

It is working. They are raging furiously.
Do you think he should have received £7,500.00 in compensation then John?
 
Back
Top