Building Regulations 1965

Joined
23 Feb 2012
Messages
10,668
Reaction score
1,774
Location
Manchester
Country
United Kingdom
Those designers who - like myself - should have been put out to grass years ago may well remember the introduction of the first national Building Regulations in 1965:

https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=Building+Regulations+1965&i

It makes a fascinating read (if you are into pain!) and shows how much building and regulations have changed in the last 50 years.

It is of course in imperial measures (no SI then) and the regs were in a very prescriptive form, unlike the modern performance standards - there was no room for debate or give-and-take; it was either pass or fail.

The default standard for deposited plans was that they should be rejected, unless they showed complete compliance with the regs. This meant that officious inspectors (and there were many) could reject even the most detailed plans on the smallest of ommissions if they were in a bad mood that day.

There were no private inspectors then, and applications were free, paid for from the rates. There was no Building Notice system.

Just a few examples to show how things have changed:

* for thermal insulation of walls of a dwelling, all that was needed was a brick cavity wall, with a 2" cavity. Buildings other than dwellings had no insulation requirements.

* in a loft conversion, at least half the floor area had to be over 7'6" high (often unattainable today without building a dormer).

* there was no limit to the size of windows.

* every window to a habitable room needed to have an unobstructed 'zone of open space' outside it, which was detailed in a very specific way (this harked back to the sanitary legislation of the 19th century).

Like they say, the past is a different country.
 
Last edited:
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
The most pertinent thing about the old days and building regs, is that they were better enforced, and work better controlled, and people more nervous of falling foul of the inspector - which generally meant that higher standards were maintained by default.
 
The most pertinent thing about the old days and building regs, is that they were better enforced, and work better controlled, and people more nervous of falling foul of the inspector - which generally meant that higher standards were maintained by default.
I think partly that was a function of building construction being simpler and with fewer choices (particularly in the domestic field) and the regs themselves also being easier to follow and less open to interpretation.
 
I think partly that was a function of building construction being simpler and with fewer choices (particularly in the domestic field) and the regs themselves also being easier to follow and less open to interpretation.
Less ****s
 

DIYnot Local

Staff member

If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.

Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.


Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local

 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top