F1 (but don't read if you don't know the result)

What's more important - winning or taking part?

  • Winning

    Votes: 6 37.5%
  • Taking part

    Votes: 3 18.8%
  • Lewis Hamilton

    Votes: 1 6.3%
  • Pit babes

    Votes: 6 37.5%

  • Total voters
    16
  • Poll closed .
Joined
21 Oct 2004
Messages
19,557
Reaction score
29
Country
United Kingdom
There's a subtle but clear bias in ITV's coverage of F1 - BlundellBrundleFly and Steve Rider seem overjoyed today. The latter even said that a processional race is acceptable in the circumstances.

Is it?

Is it better for the sport that the TV commentators want their own boy to win, or is it better to always have a good race?

Is the quality of racing on the track secondary to the race to win the championship?
 
Sponsored Links
It's not the result of the poll that matters. That can always be fiddled with afterwards to hand out the required red carpet treatment :LOL:
 
you lot are a bunch of wanders. When Lewis wins in 2 weeks I stand to win oner 100000 gbp.

DAVE
 
Sponsored Links
All this piffle about Lewis Hamilton being "too aggressive". What a load of ballcocks!!!
Was Senna not aggressive??
Was Schumacher not aggressive???
You have to be aggressive, arrogant, cocky, call it what you like, in sport to win things.
Taking part no longer applies if you want to win things I'm afraid :)
 
Back
Top