National Grooming Gangs Inquiry Announced

[Knave of Hearts]

The quickening.

Yes your, and others abuse is coming quicker than usual.
Have you tried having a discussion for a change. Although I suspect your confidence has taken a bit of a beating today.

 

[Brigadier]

Children were abused.

And you tnucs are trying to score points.

W@nkers.

 

[morqthana]

Well I'm hoping to shame johnny into S-ing TFU about this subject.

 

[Knave of Hearts]

Well I'm hoping to shame johnny into S-ing TFU about this subject.

You can't shame someone without shame into anything.

 

[fillyboy]

Although I suspect your confidence has taken a bit of a beating today.

In your dreams Himmy, I'll be here long after you and you are gone.

 

[Knave of Hearts]

In your dreams Himmy, I'll be here long after you and you are gone.

I'm in no position to discuss hypothetical scenarios about who will outlive another.

 

[Knave of Hearts]

Just to clarify, the current title of the enquiry is

National inquiry into group-based child sexual exploitation and abuse

but the Terms of Reference have not yet been finalised:

The inquiry’s terms of reference will of course follow, shaped by a public consultation.

https://hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/2025-09-15/debates/DC576ED3-B580-43D1-AD5F-99A25179E6F4/details

;

 

[Leftum]

Children were abused.

And you tnucs are trying to score points.

W@nkers.

That’s rich—wow

 

[johnny2007]

Leftum has presented some posts by Mottie, fillystine and Pete which supposedly quote Toms' posts. Those poster have a history of dishonesty and have several axes to grind with me, probably with Tom before me. So alteration of Tom's posts by those posters is very probable.
There's no way of knowing if they have altered those posts of Tom or not.
How does that "bust" me?

The deleted members posts are identical to the quotes, hence they've not been edited.
Busted!

Well I'm hoping to shame johnny into S-ing TFU about this subject.

 

[Knave of Hearts]

The deleted members posts are identical to the quotes, hence they've not been edited.
Busted!

FFS, the deleted member's post have also been deleted.

Tell me which you think are the deleted member's original posts:

 

[johnny2007]

Did we, show me.

Shamima Begum Loses Latest Citizenship Appeal

Yes, exactly them. In 500 years your descendants will picture British people as black Africans or Asians, as the invasion will be completed before the end of the century and that will be the new normal. The end of the century is just 75 years away, not 500 years away. :rolleyes...

www.diynot.com

Here it is, retarrd!
You're a very dishonest thing.
As you were shown of doing wrong you reported me and got me barred from that thread.
What a lowlife!

 

[Leftum]

FFS, the deleted member's post have also been deleted.

Tell me which you think are the deleted member's original posts:
View attachment 396795

In that pic

Not in the above pic—your desperation is almost admirable—

 

[Knave of Hearts]

The Guardian puts the most informative article that I've seen so far.
Baroness Casey's recommendation was for a Group Based Child Exploitation enquiry, not just a grooming gangs enquiry.

Baroness Casey was clear: this was always supposed to be an inquiry into group-based child sexual exploitation (CSE). It was not a ‘grooming gangs’ inquiry,” she said.

Jess Phillips appeared to want to concentrate on grooming gangs, but it was for the group to decide.
Some of the survivors panel wanted it to be wider, others didn't. Those that didn't decided to resign in protest, saying that they didn't want Jess Phillips to remain, even though she agreed with them?

Phillips added: “I know it’s hard to trust but I can promise you no one is trying to manipulate the response and it is my view that it is only a grooming gangs specific inquiry but it is not right for me to make that decision without it being formally consulted on.”

Grooming gangs inquiry divided over the question of widening its focus

Splits grow over its remit as survivors angered by effort to recruit chairs from professions that failed to protect them

www.theguardian.com

 

[Knave of Hearts]

In that pic

Not in the above pic—your desperation is almost admirable—

Can we just agree what you've just said, Tom's original posts do not appear in the image that I screen scraped?
So in which image do Tom's original posts appear?

 

[pete01]